Database Design & Discussion
A forum for discussion of database design for Harpoon Classic/Commander's Edition.
Visit Platform Requests for a tool to request changes and additions to the HC Platform Databases.
332 topics in this forum
-
Question: The time needed for repairs can be modified in the database? It depends on the type of unit / structure? or the type of damage? (Good idea for the "wish list", structures or bases for repairs "fast" units ...) tanks
-
- 2 replies
- 1.6k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Does anyone recall whether any of the "OEM" databases, going back at least to HC Gold, ever have had Phantom IIs with a loadout that had only the four Sparrows and no Sidewinders, as in the case of some of the early F-4 marks)? Thanks.
-
- 2 replies
- 1.6k views
-
-
What is the Database number that has DDG-1000 in it? Is there a database with the A-6F Intruder2 or the A-12 Avenger2 or the Arsenal Ship in it?
-
- 2 replies
- 1.8k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Hello, i am really impressed about the recent versions of Harpoon HCE. I am spending long and funny hours playing this game. However, I would like to know if the following could be improved. I have noticed that some platforms have not picture assigned. Is it possible that we, users, could add some of them by ourselves? Could someone explain me how to do it? If so, could it be possible to add pcitures for different national planes? For example, F-16 is operated by different countries. Is it possible to show a different pictures depending onf the country you are playing? The last question is about the whether the option of of coast guard/boarding by an as…
-
- 2 replies
- 1.7k views
-
-
Ships designated to employ F-35C and/or F-35B and year target dates: USS Wasp (LHD 1) USS Essex (LHD 2) USS America (LHA 6) HMS Queen Elizabeth (UK) USS Carl Vinson (CVN 70) ITS Cavour (Italy) USS Makin Island (LHD 😎 USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) USS Tripoli 2021 (LHA 7) USS George Washington 2022 (CVN 73) USS Boxer 2023 (LHD 4) USS Theodore Roosevelt 2023 (CVN 71) USS Iwo Jima 2024 (LHD 7) USS Bataan 2025 (LHD 5) USS Gerald Ford 2025 (CVN 78) https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2021/12/end-of-year-2021-f-35-milestones/
-
-
- 2 replies
- 758 views
-
-
I was experimenting in the Scenario Editor. Trying to set up airbases and assets to resemble the current situation with Libya and the no-fly zone. Could not find any Canadian F-18 to load. Is this missing from the current standard HCDB? And as an alternative, which version of an F-18 would most resemble the CF-18 ?
-
- 2 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
I've noticed that in the latest version of the HCDB, weapons based on the Mk 82 do more damage, and those based on the Mk 84 do significantly less, than in previous versions. I presume that this is based on a paper rules update, but what was the rationale? 'Enquiring minds want to know!'
-
- 2 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
Some code that I changed years ago has been bothering me. At one point I limited the Damage Points of non-nuclear weapons to 999 DP. That has no functional merit in the code so I've gone back to the old limit of 30,000DP for a conventional weapon. So have fun DB editors, you can make bigger bombs again...
-
- 2 replies
- 1.7k views
- 1 follower
-
-
Brad, I believe that you indicated that most of the new units are now derived from H4.1 paper rules. I hope that this is somewhat the case for the ground units as I would like to request the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps Brigade found on page 37 of Dave Schuler's Harpoon Naval Review 2003. Do you have access to these stats? Can you work with Adjusted Unit Ground Combat Strengths (GCS)? I can list them here if need be and hopefully you can meld them into something workable in the near future. Please let me know. Forever I shall remain, the banned one, Pete
-
- 2 replies
- 1.8k views
-
-
Includes all the data the budding db designer may want - payloads, ranges, combat radius... http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/SAC.htm
-
- 2 replies
- 2k views
-
-
I was looking over the loadouts for the F-22A Raptor in the default db, and noticed a few problems. First, the Intercept loadout is listed as 4 * AIM-120C5, 2 * AIM-120D, and 1 * AIM-9X. Should there not be TWO AIM-9X? Second, the GP loadout lists, among other things, 2 * GBU-31 (BLU-109) JDAM. GBU-31 is a 2000-lb bomb, whereas AFAIK, the F-22 is only capable of loading the smaller 1000-lb GBU-32. Finally, the GP-2 loadout lists the GBU-39/B SDB as having a damage rating of 40. The Small Diameter Bomb is a 250-lb class weapon which packs approximately 50 lbs of HE, which should give a damage rating of 4 or 5. One source for the F-22 is here: http://www.globalsecurity.…
-
- 2 replies
- 2.4k views
-
-
Discussions on chat revolving around possible inclusion of generic radars. TPS-43 Use:3D Large:315, Medium:195, Small:126, VSmall: 57, and Stealthy:32 TPS-44 Use:AS Large:162, Medium:100, Small:65, VSmall:29, and Stealthy:16 May be dated as these apparently were employed in Falklands.
-
- 2 replies
- 4.1k views
-
-
In HCDB 080406, I note that the RF-5S Tigereye from Singapore seems to have the loadouts for an attack aircraft, rather than a recon bird. As I was hoping to use it as a stand-in for South Korea's RF-5, which is not in the DB, in a Second Korean War scenario, I was wondering if it might be given a recon loadout, as well or instead? Thank ye ...
-
- 2 replies
- 1.9k views
-
-
I recently read (from a link in harpgamer) the article "Mig Alley" re the korean war. It sounds like a great basis for some harpoon scenarios. I've looked at databases and don't see one that seems to fit the era, is that correct? If I use the new weapons/sensors database (good one) any tips on good places to get suitable info on platforms, particularly planes, from the era. Early jet fighters like the Mig 15s and sabres would be a start.
-
- 2 replies
- 1.7k views
-
-
Somewhere in IRC or a forum or mailing list a number of months ago someone mentioned their own private DB of fanciful platforms. I would be most interested in hearing from you and possibly working together. My fictional DB obviously is not progressing as quickly as I would like but I do still want to offer it and get your platforms out there for public consumption as well. If you are out there, or anyone else is interested, please contact me. Thank you!
-
- 1 reply
- 1.5k views
- 1 follower
-
-
-
Second Chinese Carrier. View full record
-
- 1 reply
- 605 views
-
-
Next time you are working on the HCDB2, could you look into the range figures of these aircraft? Or, conversely, reduce the range of the F/A 18 family so they correspond better. Thanks. View full record
-
- 1 reply
- 649 views
- 1 follower
-
-
In the last version of the HCDB I see some AS radars, as they of Su-15 and CF-101B are labeled as RO radars and not as AS radars, and both with a reasonable high range. Is a mishap, or the label RO is not "Range Only" radar ?
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-
-
I am brand new to scenario and DB design (but not to Harpoon, boxed set in 90, comp version in 95) and have what may be a stupid question. How do you determine the RCS value of a ship? I am currently updating a database to include the fleets of the Americas, I finished most of the work on Cuba this morning. Hopefully one day soon I will be able to share the fleets that go with Tony E's battlesets of the area. Bob Andrepont Louisiana
-
- 1 reply
- 1.4k views
-