Jump to content

broncepulido

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3,144

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

broncepulido last won the day on February 26

broncepulido had the most liked content!

1 Follower

About broncepulido

  • Birthday 12/12/1962

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Valencia, Spain

Recent Profile Visitors

39,841 profile views

broncepulido's Achievements

Enthusiast

Enthusiast (6/14)

  • Dedicated Rare
  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Conversation Starter Rare

Recent Badges

63

Reputation

  1. broncepulido
    In fact Tu-22M3M is present in the HCDB2 (Entry 8440) from years ago, and armed with Kh-32 (Entry 18470), but I dont use it in the scenarios because has not been very probably series-built, as recorded by Sutton and Cooper: http://www.hisutton.com/Russia-Med-BACKFIRE-Kh-32.html
  2. broncepulido
    As usual, confused about day and hour! I hope better next time! Glad you enjoy it!
  3. broncepulido
    TU-22M3M - SU-34 - SU 57 Are in the DB from some five years ago.
  4. broncepulido
    Again and again, more ridiculous again. Now Independence-class limited to only 15 knots by structural cracks (But only the even numbered hulls, hahaha): https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-navy/2022/05/10/the-littoral-combat-ships-latest-problem-class-wide-structural-defects-leading-to-hull-cracks/
  5. broncepulido
    Full description in SITREP 62.
  6. broncepulido
    Another bad point for ASW tasks! "LCS is as noisy as an aircraft carrier" https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2022/05/admiral-gilday-explains-lcs-asw-and-mcm-module-decisions/
  7. broncepulido
    Corrected, thanks!
  8. broncepulido
    The LCS complete failure here in short: https://seapowermagazine.org/navys-lcs-decommissioning-proposals-would-bring-major-change-for-retained-ships/
  9. broncepulido
    The LCS complete failure here in short: https://seapowermagazine.org/navys-lcs-decommissioning-proposals-would-bring-major-change-for-retained-ships/
  10. broncepulido
    Just the Larry Bond evaluation the same 14 April 2022:
  11. broncepulido
    For me this is a correct logic: GetUnitsATA only uses the Loadout's DATA if the loadout has unexpended Annex_D (missile) or Annex_G1 (bomb) weapons. That is a strange restriction. But I don't understand the meaning of this first sentence! Note to self, combat3.c, GetUnitsATA and effect4.c, CheckAirMissileHits which is using. I thought there was a reason for that but am blanking on it currently.
  12. broncepulido
    For me this is a correct logic: GetUnitsATA only uses the Loadout's DATA if the loadout has unexpended Annex_D (missile) or Annex_G1 (bomb) weapons. That is a strange restriction. But I don't understand the meaning of this first sentence! Note to self, combat3.c, GetUnitsATA and effect4.c, CheckAirMissileHits which is using. I thought there was a reason for that but am blanking on it currently.
  13. broncepulido
    Almost sure not, 10+10=10, or 20+10=20, at least for years.
  14. broncepulido
    With all the in service Freedom-class LCS to be decomissionned next year, this is clearly now a hypothetical scenario!!! https://news.usni.org/2022/03/29/all-freedom-littoral-combat-ships-in-commission-tapped-for-early-disposal
  15. broncepulido
    Good and belated question
×
×
  • Create New...