Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

HarpGamer

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

broncepulido

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by broncepulido

    • 529 downloads
    Red Spanish Main, Juny 1986. A simple and introductory scenario ... or perhaps not. Note: In this scenario, to avoid spoilers, it is better to play the US/Blue side a few times, and only after play the Soviet/Red side. 1986 was a year full of events with strategic implications, some of them very unexpected: Soviet war in Afghanistan, US retaliatory strikes on Libya against the Gaddafi's terrorist actions, Challenger disaster, launching of the Mir space station, Chernobyl atomic disaster in the Soviet Union ... Many things and alternative historical lines of action could go wrong and degenerate in an open war. The first reform of Mikhail Gorbachev, the new Secretary General of the Politburo of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was a heavy restriction in the sales of vodka to prevent the alcoholism in the Soviet Union. This measure provocked the overthrowing of Gorbachev and a new Politburo composed exclusively by Communist Party of the Soviet Union hard-liners. As consequence, at the unexpected hostilities start some ships of the Soviet Red Banner Northern Fleet showing the flag in neighbouring fellow countries are trapped in the Spanish Main, like the long time ago vanished pirates, and they need to reach the safe haven of Havana (near YVa) in eight days or so, before the US can concentrate forces coming from the East Coast and the Northern Atlantic in the Caribbean to obliterate them. Is confirmed the presence of the nuclear-powered battlecruiser Kirov in the trapped forces, but her presence is balanced because the supposed dominance of the newly recommissioned battleship BB-61 Iowa and her surface action group, after the reactivation of the battleships by the aim of President Ronald Reagan and Secretary of the Navy John Lehman to create a 600-ship navy, and just after the correction of her deficiencies after a recent InSurv inspection. Also, Hurricane Bonnie precludes the use of land-based air assets, prevents the use of air strikes and reconnaissance planes against the Soviet ships, and masks his transit to the Cuban harbours. Key of the unnamed Air Bases: ABa, Howard AFB MPHO, USA. ACa, Guantanamo Bay MUGM, USA. ADa, Homestead KHST, USA. AXa, Roosevelt Roads TJNR, USA. AYa, Key West NAS KNQX, USA. AZa, Key West International KEYW, USA. BAa, Kingston MKJP, Jamaica. YWa, Gustavo Rizo MUBA/Baracoa, Cuba YXa, Camaguey MUCM, Cuba. YYa, Sancti Spiritus MUSS, Cuba. YZa, Santiago de Cuba MUCU, Cuba. ZAa, Cienfuegos MUCF, Cuba. ZBb, Mariel Port, Cuba. ZCa, Playa Baracoa MUPB, Cuba ZTa, La Coloma MULM, Cuba. ZUa, Havana Jose Marti MUHA, Cuba. ZVa, Santa Clara MUSC, Cuba. ZWa, Pinar del Rio/San Julian MUSJ, Cuba. ZXa, San Antonio de los Banos MUSA, Cuba. ZYa, Holguin MUHG, Cuba. ZZa, Managua MNMG, Nicaragua. The Cuban warships and submarines are represented by equivalent types of other Soviet satellite navies. Enrique Mas, October 2011 Edited: Changes 5 October 2011: a number of not used Air Bases deleted to speed-up the gameplay. ICAO designation added to the Air Bases. Unnecessary nuclear release deleted. Changes 13 October 2011: Group AKS (Kocak) restored course, speed and alternate start points. Two not used Air Bases deleted to speed-up the gameplay.
  1. Not reading, but I finded this book just now, International Electronic Countermeasures Handbook By Horizon House, Journal of Electronic Defense: http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Y8kePYF...dar&f=false It can be interesting ...
  2. As you know, I cannot delete names from older entries in the DB because it would fundamentally break pre-existing scenarios. This is a well established tenet of the HCDB. What I have been doing, instead, is to assign the pennant number instead of the commissioned name, to help discern the difference. Yes, I know Brad, thanks, it's only a comment as obsessive problem for me This week I'm not at home, but looking in the spare time for something about the Knoxes ....
  3. Some little comments about the ships in the new entries of the Spruance-class DD: - The DD-976 Merrill was never converted with VLS and should be deleted from entry 3302, but equipped with the ABL from 1981 (test ship, IOC late 1984 as in Conway’s) to the end. http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/976.htm - Also the DD-965 Kinkaid was not converted with VLS at least in June 1992, and as the SQR-15 was retired from the Spruances in 1992, I suppose she should deleted from entry 3302. http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/965.htm http://www.navsource.org/archives/05/0596517.jpg - Also we should delete the names O’Bannon, Fletcher, John Young, Nicholson, Briscoe and Oldendorf from the entries 2395 Imp Spruance (1993) and 2396 Imp Spruance (1994) because they are RAM-equipped ships, reflected for the same time period on the entry 3304 Imp Spruance (1997). - Also we should delete the names Fletcher and Thorn (No Mk23 TAS ships) from the entry 2397 Imp Spruance (88/1) because they are RAM-equipped ships, reflected for the same time period on the entry 3303 Imp Spruance (88/3) But those are not transcendent details
  4. About the submarine decoys: Some years ago in HC Gold Edition I experimented with similar submarine decoys. I've reproduced both sides torpedoes with the same designation and speeds (i.e. a named USET-80 real torpedo and a named USET-80 decoy, because in the tactical screen sometimes you can see the name of the enemy torpedo, with the same speed and ranges, but without damage points and the same PH), to try to confuse me about if the submarine was firing real torpedoes or decoys, but can be better a slow running torpedo simulator with greater endurance, as modelled by Brad. I think the decoy must be targetable both to submarines and ships, not only to submarines, for creating more confussion and decoys possibilities. Other possibility can be to create torpedo decoys for surface ships, but I've not thinked on it yet ... I don't remember the real/historical names of the decoys employed, but here some of the load of decoys in some submarines in my HC Gold DB, based on personal research. I think I only added decoys launched by ad-hoc mounting: US submarines: - San Juan and Virginia class SSN: 7xDecoy Launcher Mk.2, with 2xdecoys (Mk 48 Mod 5 ADCAP) each (now I see my answer was the same as Brad's !!! PH=1, DP=1). - Seawolf class SSN: 8xDecoy Launcher Mk.2, with 2xdecoys (Mk 48 Mod 5 ADCAP) each. - Jimmy Carter class SSN: 10xDecoy Launcher Mk.2, with 2xdecoys (Mk 48 Mod 5 ADCAP) each. - Lafayette class SSBN: 4xDecoy Launcher Mk.2, with 2xdecoys (Mk 48 Mod 5 ADCAP) each. - Ohio class SSBN and SSGN: 4xDecoy Launcher Mk.2, with 2xdecoys (Mk 48 Mod 5 ADCAP) each. Russian submarines: - Akula II and Improved Akula I, and Yasen class SSN: 6xDecoy Launcher USET-80, with 2xdecoys (USET-80) each. - Akula I and Mike class SSN: 1xDecoy Launcher USET-80, with 2xdecoys (USET-80) each. I think this only double mount in some Russian submarines was hypothetical, replacing the infamous twin 533mm BGT Tube with 2xShkval E fast unguided torpedo. - Oscar I/II class SSGN: 1xDecoy Launcher USET-80, with 2xdecoys (USET-80) each. - Sierra I/II class SSN: 1xDecoy Launcher USET-80, with 2xdecoys (USET-80) each. - Victor III class SSN: 1xDecoy Launcher USET-80, with 2xdecoys (USET-80) each. - Delta I/II/III/IV class SSBN: 1xDecoy Launcher USET-80, with 2xdecoys (USET-80) each. - Typhoon class SSBN: 1xDecoy Launcher USET-80, with 2xdecoys (USET-80) each. - Yankee Notch and Yankee C class SSGN and Yankee I SSBN: 1xDecoy Launcher USET-80, with 2xdecoys (USET-80) each. UK submarines: - Vanguard class SSBN: 6xDecoy Launcher Tigerfish Mk2, with 2xdecoys (Tigerfish Mk2) each. - We should assume the British SSN Trafalgar, Astute and Swiftsure (post-1997) as with the same level of decoys than Vanguard (Edited 31 October 2011, for keep a record about submarine decoys).
  5. Very, very impressive the latest work of Brad improving the DB, thanks, Brad. Now we can count with a greater and updated number of naval platforms and historical versions of previous vessels. The standard DB 1980-2015 has been cleaned-up and improved a lot from the latest months, if you have not aware of it, and is a far better than a year ago Brad ever has introduced the first submarine decoys in some submarines !!! I'm thinking in all those issues, but with little spare time these weeks (I will be from tomorrow the next week at http://cud.unizar.es/CursoDefensa , I will present the little paper La Expansion del Estado del Miedo ). I've see Brad has corrected also some errors present in the DB from years from his origin, thanks (as some previous very improbable and "copious" loadouts ). As I copy manually the new entries in my personal version of the standard DB, I can see some minor error and issues I will post here : - The RF-4B Phantom II lacks the carrier capable flag and is unusable as carrier aircraft. - The B767 CRAF has not deleted the now ASW loadout 55339 used on the P-2J. - The Decatur DDG (1971-1983) has a missile launcher Mk13 (59688) with SM-2MR Block III (1988+), but I suppose she was equipped with SM-1MR, perhaps we can employ the mount 59684 with SM-1MR Block II/III (1968+). - Kongo class DDG is equipped in the DB for one or two helicopters and large helipad, her helicopter capability should be zero, has not hangar facilities, coherent with other ships in the DB with helo pad but without hangar. - The two Azov have interchanged her SA-N-6a and SA-N-6b mounts, also the older variant Azov (1134BF/80) should have SA-N-4a and SA-N-3a, and the newer Azov (1134BF/92) SA-N-4b and SA-N-3b. - The Sverdlov (68A) is without sensors and weapons. - The Sverdlov (70E) has the SA-N-2 launcher duplicated (and probably only 10 SA-N-2 per launcher). - The Russian Sovremenny 956A lacks the aft 130mm mount, only the 956EM (Chinese) variant lacks the aft mount, as reflected in the DB. - The Golf SSQ/Project 629R retains her forward TT, as in: http://russian-ships.info/eng/submarines/project_629.htm - ZQQ-5/5B quoted ranges are A:2,6, P:3,4, CZ:1, but in the more modern ZQQ-6 A:3,4, P:2,6, CZ:2, not very congruent. - The Soryu class SS has ZQQ-7 or ZZQ-7B sonar, not ZQQ-6. More ideas later, ordered by sections ...
  6. About the Russian profiles I'm not sure, but because the drawing style two hints can be: From the pages of some articles of Modelist Konstructor: http://www.modelist-konstructor.ru/ http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com...ist-Konstruktor http://www.aviapress.com/viewproducer.htm?MKR http://www.armchairgeneral.com/rkkaww2/sou...Konstruktor.htm From the pages of Morskaya Collechiy series of books, a spin-off of the best articles in Modelist-Konstructor: http://modelist-konstruktor.ru/mr/0404
  7. No, unfortunately I do not, but I have to say that some of it does look familiar. Maybe an enterprising sleuth can nail down the sources. The colour images are of Modern Naval Combat, by David Miller and Chris Miller, Salamander Books 1986, with a lot of guesses and almost on the closing stages of the Cold War, but also one of the hard years (Soviet war in Afghanistan, Libyan strikes, Challenger disaster, launching of the Mir space station, Chernobyl ...) . For me is a seminal work . But I suppose the same illustrations can be in other later Salamander book. http://www.amazon.com/Modern-Naval-Combat-...r/dp/0517613506
  8. Also in the 1970s and 1980s disarmament talks, to not unveil the real designation of the Soviet/Russian weapons ...
  9. You're meaning Iranian vessels, not Iraqui vessels ...
  10. Amazing and amusing !
  11. I think the concrete link could be this: http://xkcd.com/528/
  12. I think the same as your, Warhorse.
  13. Thanks by the report!- hope you have not problems with stopping submarines, in my computers ever- will see at it the next week ...
  14. Thanks Tony, this week I'm on holidays near Arles, only wit the smartphone, the next week I will proceed on it
  15. On holidays near Arles, France, thanks for the new Soviert/Russian subs. Very diffucult for me to write with the smartphone, more comments on ten days or so
  16. File Name: Submarines Galore 1982 !!! File Submitter: broncepulido File Submitted: 05 Sep 2011 File Category: GIUK A submarine-only scenario without other diversions, inspired by some old scenario booklets of the Harpoon 3 series, good for testing submarines (specially the new ones of the HCDB-110831), submarine tactics, sonars, torpedoes and other ASW weapons. Perhaps the Western submarines are numerically over-represented, but it's reflecting the original and very reduced in number of submarines paper scenarios. Also it's configured as a vanilla scenario for lazy players wanting to enjoy a simple pastime, and with the aim of replayability thanks to the aleatority of the starting positions and of the units presence or not presence. I think it's playable at the 10 or even 30 minutes time compression ... before any contact. Scenario Background: The South Atlantic War is going very bad for the British side from a few weeks ago and the South American countries are openly supporting Argentine, menacing with the employ of military force and with the blockade of the British sea lanes southwards. As consequence most of the Royal Navy operational SSN are concentrated keeping at bay in port the other South American navies and preventing his intervention in the Argentine side. This movement has provoked the hard-line communists in the Kremlin to start a submarine feint againts the NATO forces in the GIUK gap, perceiving a good oportunity for start a war with any little casus belli as excuse and defeat the Western Alliance with the Royal Navy engaged in the South Atlantic, At the start of this covert WWIII in the North Atlantic on 1982, the bad weather and also the political uncertitude precludes the use of air and surface assets. To keep low the social unrest because the war, the opening naval actions are limitated to the discrete submarine operations, in a situation remembrance of the 1939 Phony War and of the 1994 Tom Clancy's novel Debt of Honor (where both Japan and the United States are in war against the other, but both governments are occulting the fact to his respective public opinions to prevent the collapse of the stock markets), but these underwater actions are not less decisive or murderous than on a full open war. Enrique Mas, September 2011 Note: September 2011 editions were only for best setting of submarines speeds and depths. Modification 23 December 2011: older variants of previous submarine classes replacing erroneous period variants (As Agosta (1980) replacing Agosta (1988)). Old variants of British SSN replacing some Oberon class SS. New submarine class replacing erroneous types (As Narval SS replacing Daphne SS). Click here to download this file
    • 587 downloads
    A submarine-only scenario without other diversions, inspired by some old scenario booklets of the Harpoon 3 series, good for testing submarines (specially the new ones of the HCDB-110831), submarine tactics, sonars, torpedoes and other ASW weapons. Perhaps the Western submarines are numerically over-represented, but it's reflecting the original and very reduced in number of submarines paper scenarios. Also it's configured as a vanilla scenario for lazy players wanting to enjoy a simple pastime, and with the aim of replayability thanks to the aleatority of the starting positions and of the units presence or not presence. I think it's playable at the 10 or even 30 minutes time compression ... before any contact. Scenario Background: The South Atlantic War is going very bad for the British side from a few weeks ago and the South American countries are openly supporting Argentine, menacing with the employ of military force and with the blockade of the British sea lanes southwards. As consequence most of the Royal Navy operational SSN are concentrated keeping at bay in port the other South American navies and preventing his intervention in the Argentine side. This movement has provoked the hard-line communists in the Kremlin to start a submarine feint againts the NATO forces in the GIUK gap, perceiving a good oportunity for start a war with any little casus belli as excuse and defeat the Western Alliance with the Royal Navy engaged in the South Atlantic, At the start of this covert WWIII in the North Atlantic on 1982, the bad weather and also the political uncertitude precludes the use of air and surface assets. To keep low the social unrest because the war, the opening naval actions are limitated to the discrete submarine operations, in a situation remembrance of the 1939 Phony War and of the 1994 Tom Clancy's novel Debt of Honor (where both Japan and the United States are in war against the other, but both governments are occulting the fact to his respective public opinions to prevent the collapse of the stock markets), but these underwater actions are not less decisive or murderous than on a full open war. Enrique Mas, September 2011 Note: September 2011 editions were only for best setting of submarines speeds and depths. Modification 23 December 2011: older variants of previous submarine classes replacing erroneous period variants (As Agosta (1980) replacing Agosta (1988)). Old variants of British SSN replacing some Oberon class SS. New submarine class replacing erroneous types (As Narval SS replacing Daphne SS).
  17. It's not only the Horn of Africa pirate crisis what remember us the importance of boarding parties also in modern times. Casually I was looking today this photos of the DE-1074 USS Harold E. Holt in the Mayaguez incident, and I think it's worth of sharing: http://www.navsource.org/archives/06/06021074.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayaguez_incident
  18. Wow! Very impressive landscape and very good feelings in the air ...
  19. About the F-15E or F-15I it can be true, the 12 weapons under the CFT are rated at 2.000 lb (also the centerline pylon and the closer to the fuselage underwing pylons, apparently a total at least of 15x2.000 lb): http://www.f-15e.info/joomla/en/weapons/we...external-stores
  20. Very, very impressive effort and results, Brad It's a pity the size limitation of the DBs to 2047 or so entries in each category (the loadouts problem mainly, because that is very difficult to model new planes), but I'm sure we can keep living with it. And also, editing the DBs we are taking priceless lessons about weapon platforms, clarifying his historical evolution, and keeping records from use for next editions of the game, or for other uses ... Incidentally, "somebody" e-mailed me a pair of hours ago stating in the future paper rules, the BQQ-10 values will be probably: BQQ-10 (software and harware modifications to the previous BQQ-5, BQQ-6 and BSY-1 installed in Providence, Ohio and San Juan classes, replacing all the previous sonars on 2013): Active: 5.5 nm, Passive: 4.8 nm, CZ: 2. BQQ-10 (software and harware modifications to the previous BSY-2 installed in the Seawolf/Carter class, the same values for the BQQ-10(V)4 installed in the future Virginia flight III): Active: 5.5 nm, Passive: 5.5 nm, CZ: 2. A more pedestrian issue: The newly introduced in the DB Libyan Su-22 Fitter-F and Su-22M Fitter-J (entries 11024 and 11025) are almost with only air-to-air loadouts, it's intentioned, or them were forgetted? It's worth to include on those planes some air-to-ground loadouts of the other Su-22 variants compatible with them?(entries 10338 and 10726). Meanwhile, I'm working in some Cold War scenarios, but a little dissapointed because this weird thing finded tonight, a real mess for the scenarios I was developing, the enemy subs stopping after 20 minutes of playtime: http://harpgamer.com/harpforum/index.php?a...amp;showbug=208
  21. Thanks ! I hope it was playable and you enjoy it, I've not spare time this year, and is one of the few scenarios I've not played to the end ...
  22. Another hint about this neverending issue: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Tas...a_Sea,_1965.jpg The photo caption reads:
  23. Mehr Licht! (More light!) Goethe Ok , thanks !

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.