Akula

I just don't get it. When you type it out for me, I can make it work. Trying to do it on my own...not so much.

What's not finished on this one?

The command switches seem to be working.

Installer installed fine.

The snap up/down point defense engagment is confirmed fixed, note the attatched logs: MessageLog.txt

Well I got HCE working again, but currently I am down to only 1 instance (that being the latest beta). Will work on installing a second 'official' version tomorrow.

Ah, the best laid plans of mice and men... Having to reinstall a lot of stuff after finding a few computer problems...namely over 1k registry errors. So instead of being able to beta test stuff, I'm having to fix my comp this weekend.

Seems that all the network problems I've been dealing with are worked out for now. I hope to actually be able to do some HCE testing this weekend. Yay!

Yeah, glad this guy didn't end up hurt over this: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,525530,00.html

What IP address is being given to the working station? Where I'm going is a first pass look at whether you need a router behind the DSL modem or not (in these parts the DSL modem is always bundled in the same device as a router but with Cable here they are always two separate devices {not a technical requirement rather just how the providers do it}). If you are going straight to a modem and receiving a public address rather than a private/NATed address then I would only expect one machine to work. After that we can start in on whether you are running a 'real' server in which case I'll counsel that machine to be the DHCP server and all other DHCP servers to be turned off. I'd only use the router's DHCP services if there isn't a 'real' server on the network such as Windows or Linux or OS X server (mainly to ease the security burden via easier DNS management). I only charge $115/hr (USD) for networking support The good news is we found the problem...or at least the greater of the two. One of the network hubs went bad, once replaced it started working again. The second problem may very well be the DSL router/modem, as that particular piece of equipment is about 10 years old and probably needs to be replaced soon. The system is really messed up, the results of having no fewer than 6 different people work on it over the years. We have both DSL and T1, tied in together (honestly the DSL could be dropped IMO) with a server for the financial part of the office and the others simply tied directly to the T1 internet. I'm begining to regret ever having agreed to work on the computers at work. $115.00/hour? Sounds like I need to go to networking school and start my own business.

Let me run this one by here and see if anyone has ideas. I have a network that is acting strangely. 1 station on the network is functioning fine, the rest not at all. Can't even get an IP assigned to them. It is DCHP type, so it should automatically assign the IPs to the stations. I've ruled out the main hub, as the working station is tied into that one. I've taken off solo stations and gone directly to the source (DSL) and still can't get an IP assigned. Naturally I've done the usual fixes, modem reboots etc. with no change in results. Anyone have any ideas on where to start looking for the problem?

See if missiles with the flag (Snap up/down), like the terminal diving AS-4 Kitchen or AS-6 Kingfish, can be engaged by point defenses like CIWS (e.g. Phalanx). So turn on logging and fire one at a Knox. Can do.

Likely the KN-01, a domestic version of the Styx. Ah, thanks. This latest statement. Has Kim Jong-Il lost the plot, or did he never have one to begin with? I think he knows exactly what he's doing. For the past 20 years we've tried to negotiate with him, usually giving him concessions until the next outrage, at which point we negotiate again. He is playing the UN like a fiddle.

How would one go about testing the snap up/down thing?

No problems with the new installer here.

So all this time I've been struggling to see the blue units, I could have simply recolored them in Paint Shop? Well, at least it gets fixed now.

The textured maps have a tendancy to cause you to have trouble seeing the blue icons in particular. Unfortunately, there is no way to adjust the color of the textured map water, for time time being you may want to turn off the textured water and just use the light blue water.

Supplying my test scenario for the torpedo thing, I never could get a message to turn on the sonars. SONARTST2.zip

File Name: From Russia with Love? File Submitter: Akula File Submitted: 13 Apr 2009 File Updated: 13 Apr 2009 File Category: WestPac DB Used: Current Official Authors: Akula Battleset-WPac: .scq - WPac - WestPac Background: The Kurile Islands have been a point of contention between Japan and the Soviet Union since the end or World War Two. Even following the collapse of the Soviet state, the area remains disputed. Japan claims that the southern most of the Islands, which were not specifically covered in the Treaty of San Francisco of 1951, are rightfully Japanese Territory. Negotiations have yet to settle this dispute. Click here to download this file

No its finished, did I post it wrong?

I agree, this shouldn't hold up the patch. This is simply one of those things where you find its fixed because no one complains about it, tbh.

Just an update to mark #1 off my list. Yay!

File Name: FRWL2B File Submitter: Akula File Submitted: 11 April 2009 File Category: WestPac DB Used: HCDB-090128 Authors: Akula Battleset-WestPac - .SCq OK guys, here it is the much anticipated monster scenario. A warning, this is a VERY LARGE scenario and will run slowly on all but the most powerful computers. You'll need to keep the time compression low to manage it. See the included READ-ME for further info. Background: The Kurile Islands have been a point of contention between Japan and the Soviet Union since the end or World War Two. Even following the collapse of the Soviet state, the area remains disputed. Japan claims that the southern most of the Islands, which were not specifically covered in the Treaty of San Francisco of 1951, are rightfully Japanese Territory. Negotiations have yet to settle this dispute. FRWL.zip

APPROVED Working as expected now, I declare this issue fixed.