Defect Tracking

Issue Information Issue ID #000115 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2015.009 Fixed in 2015.010 lazGUI v 10 startup crash with custom scenarioPosted by donaldseadog on 13 July 2015 - 04:47 PM Using: Windows 7 HC GE 2015.0.0.9 lazGUI v 010 At startup (game time 0) game crashes with all custom scenarios I've tried, eg recent GIU2.scm (HCDB 150621). I've also tried older custom scenarios with same result. No problem with any battleset scenarios. crash report indicates lazGUI as the fault module. The crash is immediate so I have no saved game. Don Issue-115-lazGUI-v-10-startup-crash-with-custom-…

Hello, I am running HUCE 2015.72. I am editing the database and I have change the Loadout DATA of a few aircrafts. It seems that game engine always uses the aircraft DATA instead of the loadout DATA. So DATA is the same with a heavy loadout and with a light loadout. Is there anyway to use the loadout DATA instead of the aircraft DATA?

Issue Information Issue ID #000032 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2009.083 Fixed in Loiter at cruise speedPosted by Grumble on 26 July 2013 - 10:41 AM Aircrafts loitering at med or high altitude change indicated speed to cruise speed after saving then loading the game or cancelling an attack order. E.g. when the a/c prompts to launch weapons but the player cancels it. (there are probably other situations when this happens, these two are the most apparent) The a/c holds position and Throttle remains at "Loiter" but the Kts number changes to the a/c's med altitude cruise speed. Test scenario, load savegame 1 Group ACA …

Issue Information Issue ID #000033 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2009.083 Fixed in 2009.094 Long range AA missile intercept geometryPosted by Grumble on 26 July 2013 - 11:59 AM Long range anti air missiles occasionally follow very strange and unrealistic intercept paths. Looks almost as if they were flying to a precalculated intercept point and then turn towards the target, which could be normal for long range AA but this behaviour is not consistent (usually the missiles are tracking their targets all the way, see Gammon example) and the intercept points also seem wrong, like too far away, ofte…

Just notice air to air missile problem in which after engaging other aircraft with missile remaining missiles would disappear from remaining AC magazines. Example 4 plane group each with 4BVR and 4WVR missile engage 4 enemy AC. After firing on the enemy AC the total of fired missiles and remaining missiles would vary. Each red group contained 16 BVR missiles. The F15 would fire eight but only 7 or less BVR missile would remain sometime all remaining BVR missiles would simply disappear. They would fire 8BVR missiles and upon inspection of attacking group in unit window, one or more extra missiles would be gone leaving 7 or less. Cntr Alt S show no other than the missi…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000012 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2008.050 ⦁ Fixed in 2009.082 Low Level Light - IR Ship Flags Working?Posted by miller7219 on 06 March 2013 - 08:22 PM The Low Level Light (LLL) flag may be over-reaching with it's detection distance. Is the IR even working? When I ran the attached test scenario is was nighttime. You'll have to use my homemade database to run the attached test scenario (using EC2003 GIUK Battleset). 1. Play Blue and crank the time compression up to 5 mins. You'll get a detection at 21nm....if it's nighttime (haven't tested during daylight). Both Blue and Red a…

Issue Information Issue ID #000198 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 0000.000 Fixed in Main Body Convergence ProblemPosted by Nightshade111 on 18 October 2017 - 09:26 AM I'm having a problem with moving ships within the main body ring. If my ships are sailing on a course and I try to move 1 or more ships within the main body then those particular ships whose position I'm shifting (within the main body) all converge together at one point within the main body ring. The only solution I've found to make adjustments within that ring is to cancel the formation's course until the particular ships I'm moving take up their new position…

Hi, I've been playing most of the default Battleset scenarios, specifically WestPac, and have come across an issue where Blue Tanker units are run aground at scenario start of WestPac2 (Pirate War). No issue in official 2015.027. Maybe a beta issue or just me? Screenshot 1: Standard build 2015.027 and HCDB-150928 Screenshot 2: Beta build 2020.003 and HCDB-150929 (Same issue in HCDB2-170909) Thanks

Issue Information Issue ID #000053 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 0000.000 Fixed in Maximum missile range in plattform editor=6553 nmPosted by broncepulido on 25 September 2013 - 06:32 AM I know the situation is clear, but perousing the new big Soviet ICBMs added by Brad in the last Cold War Database iteration, I see the platform editor (and perhaps also the Game Engine) limits a missile range to 6553 nautical miles. I see it as a very minor issue, but perhaps it's of easy solving. Issue-53-Maximum-missile-range-in-plattform-editor=6553-nm.pdf

When playing the user scenario EC Tom1_1.scn, in EC2003 Battle for the Atlantic Ocean running Build 2021.006 in Win 10 (via Parallels on a Mac - its complicate but things usually work just fine!) the game crashed without warning and produced the following message: At the time of the crash my machine had roughly 1.24 GB of memory available The having re-opened Harpoon the "saved game" would not reload and produced the following message: Is this just a "thing" or can the "saved game" be rescued (because, damn it, I was winning!)? Any and all suggestions, help, advice, guidance welcomed. Regards, …

Issue Information Issue ID #000065 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2014.021 Fixed in 2014.020 Memory Allocation Fault in SE WESTPAC Backyard ScenarioPosted by eeustice on 09 November 2013 - 07:08 PM In the SE TG ALC located near northern Japan has 25 CV's and 2196 planes. When I go to Ready Aircraft I get a Memory Allocation Fault. If I Reduce the number of planed down to 1866 I can edit the aircraft load outs in the SE. If I add 5 planes and increase the number of AC to 1871 the Memory Allocation Fault returns. The SE I am using is version 2009.100. Attached are the original SE file and the a SE…

Issue Information Issue ID #000022 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 2009.080 Fixed in Memory Allocation Fault in Westpac Edited ScenarioPosted by eeustice on 07 June 2013 - 08:50 PM CV TG AMC disappeared from view in the game window around game time 7:10:41:20, however I still could see it in the unit window. I brought it back into the gam window by selecting it in the Oder of Battle drop down menu and splitting the TG. This is a similar problem to what I had on 5-6-13 with my Debug Assertion Failed Wespac Scenario Crash. This time when I brought the TG back into the screen as soon as the whole TG was beamed back into the Gam…

I was playing Giuk1 scenerio with the new 2018.05 version with DB 150928 and also tried with 150621. I notice that missile in all versions with midcource guidance would adjust path if target adjusted path unlike inertia and terminal guidance which would only if the target was still in it own sensors range of detection. I engaged with both aim120 and meteors and in all cases the missile directional arrows of flight in group window would point to the intended target yet it would not adjust course to pursue regardless of distance to target and sensors of launch aircraft on or off. They acted as if they did not have the midcourse guidance flag present. The is …

Issue Information Issue ID #000092 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 91 – Duplicate Version 2014.019 Fixed in Minor graphic column error in SE 32-bitsPosted by broncepulido on 16 October 2014 - 05:25 PM Building a new sub scenario I saw a lack of correlation between weapons values and columns in the Scenario Editor 32-bits. In the game engine all is ok. In short: The quantity of weapons number is showed in the Target type column. The target type is showed in the Range column. The weapon ranges is showed in the Hit% column The weapon PH is showed in the Damage column. See the example in attached Word file. Issue-092-Minor-graphic-col…

Issue Information Issue ID #000085 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2014.015 Fixed in 2014.017 Missing TG Units In Attacking Unit WindowPosted by eeustice on 15 September 2014 - 06:39 PM Went to launch missiles from TG ACE. There was no ships in the Attacking Unit Window. Attached is the screen shot of the Unit Window, Saved game before and after the units disappeared, and db the scenario was using. This is a 1 min time frame. I have seen this before but it was during the time I had a defective db. There are 111 units in TG ACE plus 7 ASW patrols. If you have any questions please let me know. …

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000076 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 12 – Working as Intended ⦁ Version 2014.020 ⦁ Fixed in 2014.020 Mk1 Eagle Eye - 50nm visual detection?Posted by Grumble on 13 July 2014 - 05:28 AM Background: Playing EC2003 Bear Baiting user scenario, red AI is consuming my Rafales fast. The F2 and F3 versions have only the 27nm Mica AAM vs. +40nm Alamos and Adders, but theoretically this should be manageable with the help of the Rafale's low RCS, the Su-27S 65nm radar detects it at max 12nm and even the Su-27SM's 135nm radar has max 25nm range on it (don't mess with the Su-35 though ). But in practice the Sukhoi…

Issue Information Issue ID #000077 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2014.010 Fixed in Mk2 Eagle Eye - 40nm visual detection of GBU/SDB/PGMPosted by Grumble on 15 July 2014 - 01:43 AM Linked to the Mk1 there is one other complication PGMs as Brad pointed out are supposed to be immune to AAM/SAM, they got very low RCS like the 6 for GBU-53 SDB II, to ensure this, but they are still being intercepted by AAM and SAM. Most GBUs have "High" max altitude and so these fly to target on High, I guess they are detected visually, as per 5.4.2. Radar log shows that radar detection is indeed impossible, in the first detection cycle…

Issue Information Issue ID #000078 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2014.010 Fixed in 2015.014 Mk3 Eagle Eye - AI intercepts undetected PGMsPosted by Grumble on 15 July 2014 - 02:50 AM After the Mk2 fiasco with the GBUs I tried the Hammer AASM, it has Medium max altitude, so should not be affected by the contrails visual detection, still, the Udaloy and Sovremenny pickets are engaging it with SAM. (057b.hpm, drop PGMs, bearing only, on both ships) I switched to red (058red.hpm) to check how does the detection occur, only it does not, at least SA does not report any detection, but the ships are launc…

Opened up the NACV Mission #15 - Retreat. The unit CHVG Baku has got an SA-N-9 Launcher, but the actual weapons that get fired from these mounts are SS-N-9 Siren missiles. So instead of having 96 anti-air missiles it has 96 Siren ship to ship missiles.

Issue Information Issue ID #000156 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2016.003 Fixed in 2016.007 Name long issue in GEPosted by broncepulido on 24 July 2016 - 11:44 AM As a joke for René Haar, I usually name some of the civilian vessels in the Baltic as "Sea Tow Flensburg". In the Montrose BALTOPS 2016 scenario: http://harpgamer.com...story-scenario/ The civilian yatch is clearly and correctly named "Sea Tow Flensburg" in the Scenario Editor, but the name is truncated in the Game Engine to "Sea Tow Flensbu" !!! Issue-156-Name-long-issue-in-GE.pdf Sea Tow Flensbu.zip