Defect Tracking

I have encountered a hypersonic Rafael in the You and Me Scenario created in the 2000 Norwegian Sea Battleset. In the test scenario provided I have a blue base in UK in which a single SR71 is based and a second blue base in Norway. The red base contains Rafael C which are put on patrol in the formation editor. Upon launching the SR71 to ferry to the Norwegian base and activated the radar the Rafael C soon goes hypersonic to intercept the SR71. Further testing shows this does not happen with the B or M version of the Rafael. It was brought to my attention that in the 2000 BS the platform display for these three are similar aircraft varying in only the top speed whi…

Observed building the latest scenarios. At start I did think the Red side don't launch antiship missiles from its submarines. This afternoon developed this little test scenario (Mediterranean 2003 theatre) to very this, but the results are at least "strange". 1).- Playing Blue, near the Lebanese coast. The Red AWACS detects our merchant ships, but only the two northernmost submarines, one Royal Navy and other USN lauch their anti-ship missiles (Harpoon, and the USN submarine some 90 minutes later the longer ranged old TASM), but all the others submarine groups (All Russian SSGN) sail by own AI initiative to use torpedoes againts the merchants (also doi…

Greetings All, I am noticing possible errors in how the game engine designates an icon for unknown contacts and/or allows attacking unknown contacts. Apologies if these are known issues. I still have a bunch of reading to do in the forum. Also, once I figure out what test scenario files to upload, will do. Examples: Small RED surface contact - BLUE platform: Bunker Hill class (Monterey (CM)) radiating air and surface radars. Sonar is in passive. - Weather report is perfect with visibility at 19 nm. - A small surface contact is identified by passive sonar at 22 nm. In the scenario the unit (Najin) is designate…

Issue Information Issue ID #000190 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 0000.000 Fixed in Impossible sonobuoy use tracking in Platform EditorPosted by broncepulido on 26 August 2017 - 12:43 AM A long time bug in Platform Editor (It's also possible I don't know clearly as use it). Is very difficult to track in what loadouts is carried a concrete type of sonobuoy, as the Platform Editor pops-up a blank subwindow without any results when interrogued about any sonobuoy type use. You only can track sonobuoy types use by loadout by memory or making a paper list or similar. Issue-190-Impossible-sonobuoy-use-tracking-in-Platform-…

Issue Information Issue ID #000189 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 0000.000 Fixes in Impossible sonobuoy use tracking in Platform EditorPosted by broncepulido on 26 August 2017 - 12:43 AM A long time bug in Platform Editor (It's also possible I don't know clearly as use it). Is very difficult to track in what loadouts is carried a concrete type of sonobuoy, as the Platform Editor pops-up a blank subwindow without any results when interrogued about any sonobuoy type use. You only can track sonobuoy types use by loadout by memory or making a paper list or similar. Issue-189-Impossible-sonobuoy-use-tracking-in-Platform…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000184 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2017.007 ⦁ Fixed in 2017.009 Impossible to launch ASW torpedo from helicopterPosted by broncepulido on 15 May 2017 - 01:31 PM A new bug? Essaying a new scenario, in the last 6 test or so, when a Russia 636.3 conventional submarine is very near or just below ("0" nm), the ASW torpedo (Stingray Mod 1 torpedo, refused to be launched, and I get this staff message: "Sir, the effective attack range for these aircraft is 4 NM. Target range is 0 NM. Should we close and attack?" In the attached file the Merlin is just over the Russian Kilo. Is GIUK…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000160 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2016.007 ⦁ Fixed in 2016.010 Incapable to intercept enemy aircrafts in autopatrol.Posted by broncepulido on 26 August 2016 - 05:33 AM As commented, but slightly better explained: Employing the simple F-35A Lightining II Learning Curve scenario (GIUK Battleset): The F-35 in patrol can't intercept or attack the Flankers in patrol in the Russian base, after detected at medium-long range by ESM. When F-35 are ordered "to attack" the Russian base, clicking on the own F-35 group (pretending to attack the Flankers in autopatrol entouring Kaliningrad…

use GE 2022.014, database HCDB2-170909, westpac BS In the zip is the scenario used to produce the saved game, (Important) start the scenario with auto formation patrols enabled, this produced the first MCM Sea Dragon patrol unit AA-001 which is patrolling correctly at low alt to the north east. At game start a second Sea Dragon is set via formation editor F3 to patrol to the south west and is unit AA-002, it is patrolling at medium alt and not dropping any markers. (alts can be seen in the toolbox window) In the formation editor box 001 unit is shown as an ASW Patrol, 002 unit as an AEW Patrol. I would expect both instances to patrol at low altitude and in …

Issue Information Issue ID #000169 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 2016.003 Fixed in Incorrect Scenario Analysis DataPosted by eeustice on 04 December 2016 - 10:34 AM In the Misc dropdown menu in the SE the Scenario Analysis screen shows incorrect data for both Red and Blue bases when you select Evaluate Forces. When ASW AC are on a base or ship the count shows up as a Combat aircraft instead of an ASW Aircraft on both Red and Blue sides. Attached is a screen shot of the Evaluation Forces for a small scenario . A small Scenario with Red and Blue Bases and TG's. Copy of my 161008 Fictional Database. If you have any questi…

Issue Information Issue ID #000157 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 2016.006 Fixed in Incorrect Speed After LaunchPosted by eeustice on 25 July 2016 - 08:23 PM After launching a F-21C off of CV the F-21C obtained the default altitude but never increased the speed at the default altitude after launch of Med. The f-21 still stayed at the "Low" altitude of speed 700kts instead of assuming the Medium altitude speed of 800kts. It appears that after launch that the speed of AC is not changing automatically after launch when it gets to it's cruising altitude per the speed altitude table from the db. I have included the following: …

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000111 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2015.004 ⦁ Fixed in 2015.008 Installations annex mismatchPosted by CV32 on 19 May 2015 - 03:13 AM GE does not appear to be drawing on the proper Installations annex info from the DB. Examples: EC2003 IOPG scenarios have some installations with names drawn from HCDA, not HCDB. EC2003 GIUK scenarios have some installations with names drawn from original stock DB, not HCDB. Other possibilities may exist. No savegame necessary. Just open any stock battleset scenario. Issue-111-Installations-annex-mismatch.pdf

uses GE 2023.002, included in zip: custom battleset southPacificIslands, hccw140314 db, GE.log screen shot saved game 1 sec before popup. game played on after ignoring error type-aa-invalid-ge.zip

Just playing a user scenario, and saw a flanker being shot down by a green pakistani ship. I saved it, and then the 2nd plane gets shot down as well. The game tells me I've shot down the plane. It seems logical enough that green has shot down the red plane, but my question is this supposed to happen? And would the green ships attack my planes? Should I sink green ships that threaten my forces? I remember one scenario which has a green ship which looks like a merchant cargo ship, but has a nuclear weapon in it's loadout. pakiflanker.zip

Instructions on migrating items from the Issue Tracker to this plain old forum in preparation for forum software upgrades. HarpGamer_IssueTracker2ForumTopic.pdf

Issue Information Issue ID #000194 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2017.011 Fixed in 2017.013 KC 10 tanker patrol behaviorPosted by Tony on 04 October 2017 - 01:07 PM I along with CV 32 have notice some peculiar support aircraft behavior and he has requested a scenario to show the behavior. Database used was HCDB 110531 also was observed in database HCDB 150631 In the provided scenario along with two save games I launch a variety of tanker along with fighter and AEW aircraft. First all aircraft as one plane formations as the first save shows. Expected behavior was for all aircraft to fly directly to …

Issue Information Issue ID #000047 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 2009.094 Fixed in Kirov goes for a walk (AI)Posted by Grumble on 15 September 2013 - 02:50 PM (Btw. there is no 2009.095 version yet in the Issue Tracker.) I'm playing HDS7 8.0 Cauldron with "Ignore ships running aground" (accidentally) but I don't think this is a reason for the AI surface groups to take a walk across the Crimean. The Kirov group I'm sure have a scenario plotted course going to Odessa, to my Slava group, yet it has just came ashore near Donuslav Lake and heading East-North-East. Could be trying to intercept my AGS group, which is irrelevant f…

Land attack (only) missiles are hitting sea platforms. (another TonyD, Eric70, donaldseadog adventure) zip pack includes saved game LAM1.hpq and the scenario file, LAMissile-hcdb-Westpac,from which it has played, the xml file and the GE from a play of the saved game. In the saved game start a flight of three skipjack bombers have attacked the AD AAm with three vollies of KentC Land Attack missiles, and RTB. This plane /loadout combo can't directly attack sea groups( tested seaprately). The outcome varies with different plays but invariably some Kent over run the AD (or the AD is destroyed) and go on to hit the ship Xiangyanghong 21. The Kent shouldn'…

Issue Information Issue ID #000093 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 2014.020 Fixed in Land Attack Missiles Have Incorrect Names in Unit WindowPosted by eeustice on 25 October 2014 - 10:47 AM Kind of a strange on here. The Land Attack missiles have odd names. In missile group BJM Target is ZJ003 8X RIM-162D. ZJ003 is a SA-6b missile battery. Missile launched was either a TACOM IV or TLAM-C or D. Kind of confused here on how to right this up. Checked db in both the SE and GE and it appears that I have all the correct missiles in my launchers. If this is a db issue I could not find it. Trying to launch an ASM a…

Issue Information Issue ID #000068 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2014.002 Fixed in 2014.003 Launch TASM at identified contacPosted by eeustice on 09 April 2014 - 07:31 PM Launched TASM Missiles at red surface group that was identified by radar. I did not get a bearing only when I launched the TASM's. TQS from TG AEC. Own Task Group AEC (Sounded by planes landing north of Guam) shot down launched TASM's in modified Westpac battle set in the Backyard scenario. Attached is the saved game and db. If you guys have any questions please let me know See Ya, Eric Issue-068-Launch-TASM-at-identifie…

In update 2021.005, when using the HC Launcher, if Instant Action is enabled and a commondb BattleSet is selected in the HC Launcher, the game may error out as a result of Instant Action conflicting with the BattleSet selection. This may occur after resetting the HCE registry settings in windows. Please let me know if you need more details. Eric