Defect Tracking

Issue Information Issue ID #000186 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2017.009 Fixed in 2017.013 "Circling Aircrafts" problem in composite flights?Posted by broncepulido on 28 May 2017 - 03:29 PM This is a strange situation found when building the Operation Opera 1981 scenario. In the historical Operation Opera one of the flights was not 2xF-15A, it was 1xF-15A+1xF-15B, a special F-15B with a undisclosed type of offensive ECM. My idea was to simulate it with a "composite" flight with a F-15A/B Baz 81 and a F-15A/B Baz 85, the late equipped with a stand-off jammer. No problems apparently programming the c…

Issue Information Issue ID #000004 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 0000.000 Fixed in "I like it" limitationsPosted by broncepulido on 07 December 2012 - 04:42 AM By the same reason as the downloading scenario issue I post here this issue about the new web site. Each time I want to mark some comment, post or link as "I like it" in the Facebook symbol (errr ... I see now apparently it's not a "I like it" for Facebook), I dont realize it, and I get the message "You've reached your quota of possitive votes for today". This issue is present from the start of the new website. Issue-004-_I-like-it_-li…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000164 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 11 – Cannot Reproduce ⦁ Version 2016.010 ⦁ Fixed in "Phantom" groups splitting groups in SEPosted by broncepulido on 05 November 2016 - 01:21 AM For sake of accelerate scenario building, many times I build a group with many units (Iranian MANPADS in this example), and later split it to place the diverse units on the map. Now, in SC 2016.10 (and probably in previous versions), if you split the group, the new group is not showed on the map at first instance. But you can select it alternatively with the space bar and delete keys, and after selected you can "change group posi…

After launching and setting AC to patrol at high altitude, when aircraft reaches patrol location speed goes to 0kts. Attached is a saved game just before the AC reaches it patrol location as well as the scenario created for the test. GE log has been included. If you need any additional info, please let me know. 0kts Loitering.zip

Issue Information Issue ID #000147 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2016.001 Fixed in 2016.002 1050 AC Missile LaunchPosted by eeustice on 24 February 2016 - 06:08 PM At start of scenario Air Base YXa is destroyed by gun fire (Love those 16in guns). At game time 01 seconds even though Base YXa has been destroyed it has launched 2 of planes. The 2 planes have 1050 missiles on them. At game time 1 min 35 seconds the 2 TU-160 Bombers launch 1050 missiles. There are both KH-102A Land Attack and KH-102B ASuW missiles launched at US Task Group AEC. 1. How can 2 Aircraft launch from a base at a game time o…

Issue Information Issue ID #000145 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2015.028 Fixed in 2016.001 129 Magazines on a Ship/BasePosted by eeustice on 02 February 2016 - 04:51 PM When going over 129 magazine on a ship or base both GE and SE Crash. The zip file contains a copy of my latest db with the first db file HCEEFDB-160202 containing ship 4068, last ship in the ship annex, with 128 magazines. The zip file HCEEFDB-160202-129 has the added 129th magazine to ship 4068. There is a screen shot of both the GE and SE GetMemAnnexA messages. Attached is a copy of the scenario that I plan to use for the next…

Is this behaviour going to cause any problems when the a/c have more than one type of weapon? i.e. a plane with both ARMs and bombs/AShMs? Will the release of one type cause the a/c to return to base? Conversely, will the non-release of one type (i.e. ARMs) cause the plane to continue even though it should probably RTB once the AShMs are fired?

Issue Information Issue ID #000005 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 0000.000 Fixed in 2013/01/01Posted by cullen52 on 21 December 2012 - 12:28 PM Will there be an extension of the 2013/01/01 --- 2009.66 upgrade or has it been replaced. If so, where might I download it. Thank you for any information. Issue-005-2013-01-01.pdf

Issue Information Issue ID #000205 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2017.015 Fixed in 2017.016 2017.015 Crash at startPosted by broncepulido on 06 December 2017 - 03:48 PM In my PC 2017.15 crashes inmediatly at scenario start. Issue-205-2017.015-Crash-at-start.pdf Captura de pantalla 2017-12-07 15.18.55.zip

Issue Information Issue ID #000206 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 2017.016 Fixed in 2017.016 2017.016 crash at startPosted by broncepulido on 08 December 2017 - 01:59 AM Regrettably, I see the same problems in 2017.016 after a while testing. Playing standard HCDB2 The Middle East. Error messages in attached file, crash at each scenario start, EXCEPT the very simple test scenario labeled yesterday as "GOOD", what is the only one working fine. A pity, but thanks Tony! Issue-206-2017-016-crash-at-start.pdf 1980-5 LEBANON.zip AL MADINAH ATTACK 2017-1.zip HARPOON TEST 2017-12-8.zip TEST RED SHIP NO CH…

I might have wrongly read TonyE comments on the GE changes but assumed that if no total victory conditions are set in the scenario total victory will be granted if all enemy are destroyed but this doesn't happen if there are remaining neutrals.

When Saving a Scenario that I was editing, the message below came up several times. Scenario seems to save Ok. When reopening it appears that all changes were saved. Selecting Retry seems to save the Scenario. The zip file consists of the latest edition of my db, the SE Log file and a copy of the scenario. If you need any additional info please let me know. Saved scenario with 2021.006 and save did not produce any messages and SE did not crash. Spartly Island 4 Part 1 Update 12.zip

Hey TonyE Was doing some testing on the latest launcher. Was changing load outs on AC groups and this popped up in scenario editor. It would create up to 160 new ac during re doing loadouts. It happens for BS scenarios and user created both. Verified by Eric. TonyD

In the SE when switching between the WestPac Battleset and the HDS9 Battleset a Get Annex message appears and SE crashed. If any additional information is needed. pleaselet me know.

Issue Information Issue ID #000051 Issue Type Suggestion Severity 0 – None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 2009.094 Fixed in 8 missiles 9 hitsPosted by Grumble on 21 September 2013 - 08:21 AM This is more of question. Occasionally I've seen that missiles in AA engagement get bonus pK rolls, sometimes. I thought this is a bug. Yesterday I came across a save which produced this consistently. A rule?? It seems like if a missile group is attacking an air group with N units then each missile above 2N gets two pK rolls E.g. load attached save file, if CVA attacks WUA 2 x Mig-23 with 4 missiles > 4 pK rolls 5 missiles > 6 pK rolls 6 missiles > 8 pK rolls etc…

With 2 ship task group I launched 6 AC in a group. After Splitting AC only the first plane lands from Air Group ABA after game is saved and then restarted. I launched 3 plane from each ship in 1 group. Split Plane group so that planes would land on the correct ship. Landing Test 5-Landing plane 1 is where I saved the game. After that group ABA wouldn't land anymore planes. Included in my file is the test scenario, several saved games and a copy of my db. This issue appears to be similar to the issue we had with base patrols becoming corrupt after saving a game. Thanks to DonT's tool box you are able to save the planes in the group that haven't la…

Issue Information Issue ID #000191 Issue Type Issue Severity 4 - High Status 13 – Awaiting Feedback Version 2017.011 Fixed in AC Landing Upon Take OffPosted by eeustice on 25 September 2017 - 02:33 PM In HC GE Version 2017.012 Launched 2 AC in separate groups from Blue Base on a patrol. As soon as AC took off both planes immediately went to Landing. Attached is a small scenario wit a saved game saved at 30 Sec and the again at 31 seconds a copy of my latest db. If you have any questions please let me know. I also created this scenario to look at AC Group Merging and splitting. When I split an AC group in my scenario the new group was created from the spli…

Air groups HaA and FvA were landing on the same time on carrier group AAC. When the last plane in group HaA landed group FvA did not land. Group FvA was split off of HaA. Created a test scenario with 1 base and 1 CV and the same splitting of the air group and both groups landed correctly. Created a smaller version of the game using DonT's AI tool Box and both air groups landed. The saved game has not been edited. If more saved game files are needed please let me know. AC Not Landing.zip

Issue Information Issue ID #000207 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 2017.016 Fixed in AC Loitering AltitudePosted by eeustice on 11 January 2018 - 05:32 PM When editing an Air Groups course AC would not loiter at end of course when AC stay at same altitude even though Loiter button was selected. To get the AC to loiter you need to go back into the Edit Order screen and select Set Altitude and Speed and then select Loiter. The AC will then loiter at the end of the new course. If you change altitude at the end of your course the AC will loiter at the new altitude without having to go bac and select loiter a 2nd time. Attache…

It appears that ActGroupPtr (for use with Export.dll) does not ‘fire’ when the selected group in the GE changes by virtue of an air group being split. The Zip file includes the saved game ActGrouPtrNoFIreGrpSplt.hpq and its parent scenario for use in WestPac BS with HCDB 150929 DB . To replicate open the saved game and select the Air group ABA (comprising two F-111), split one plane and follow the normal suggested setting of a course for the new group ACA. The selected group in the game changes from the original Air Group to the new Group but ActGroupPtr does not fire in export.dll addon programs eg LazGUI (see included JPG) and the ActGroupPtr remains the old s…