Looking foward to it.

Thanks by the T-33 variants, but ... it's faster than F-80, but not so faster! I think is a measurement conversion error, his speed probably should go from 524 at low to 475 at high (is curious the very scarce data about a common plane as T-33 both in web and in printed books), if we state an speed of 590 knots the T-33 is capable to go supersonic (bigger than 573.7 knots) at high on military power, better than F-35!

Thanks by the T-33 variants, but ... it's faster than F-80, but not so faster! I think is a measurement conversion error, his speed probably should go from 524 at low to 475 at high (is curious the very scarce data about a common plane as T-33 both in web and in printed books), if we state an speed of 590 knots the T-33 is capable to go supersonic (bigger than 573.7 knots) at high on military power, better than F-35!

 

Heh, yes, definitely an error there. I will look at it and you can expect a fix in the next version.

The B-47 variants ranges are halved (probably using radius for range), as stated here:

http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/B-47B_Stratojet_SAC_-_20_November_1956.pdf

http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/B-47E-IV_Stratojet_SAC_-_August_1962.pdf

http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/RB-47H_Stratojet_SAC_-_July_1964.pdf

Also is the case of halved range in the S-2 Tracker variants, if not has a helicopter-like range and it's impossible to do from 6,5 hours (S-2A/B/C/F) to 8,5-9 hours (S-2D/E/G) ASW patrols.

Thanks, I will fix these and put up a new version in the next week or so.

Great, thanks!

Same range/radius considerations about C-118/DC-6A:

http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/C-118A_Liftmaster_CS_-_1_August_1955_(Yip).pdf

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DC-6

Entry 11480 C-121 Super Constellation lacks loadout (probably provision for use of Indian Super Constellation 56602 loadout, or the very similar ranged 56764 ferry loadout of C-118 Liftmaster, after the range modifications, near 2020 n.m.).

http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/C-121C_Super_Constellation_CS_-_1_April_1955_(Yip).pdf

Same about the CH-37 Mojave, ferry range 335 nm. I think we can also add an Assault loadout with 200 nm range and 20 troops: http://www.alternatewars.com/SAC/HR2S-1_SAC_-_30_August_1958.pdf

Grumman F11F-1/F-11A Tiger, not a very important plane, but to add in the DB if someone whats to complete a concrete Carrier Air Wing:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grumman_F-11_Tiger

Looks like I have work to do. Thanks, Enrique.

Loadout 55387 (patrol with 3820 nm range, 2x250 ImpG fuel tank, DATA=5) is not employed by any plane (pretended for Canberra?).

Same with loadout 56383 (recon with 1380 nm range, recon cameras, 1x600 USG DT, 2x370 USG DT, DECM Gen 1, RF-4 Phantom?).

More confussion about radius and range, I think: the ranges in F-105 and F-100 are apparently very undertimated (as example F-100F Wild Weasel, with two loadouts with a range of 280 and 215 nm, it will be imposible to reach as example Da Nang, in the center of Vietnam, from the historical base of the Wild Weasel forcé in Korat AB, Thailand, at 359 nm distance).

 

Also, the nuclear 55357 loadout (with 1xMk7 Thor nuke) of the French F-100D Super Sabre should be implemented in other NATO Super Sabres, or at least in the USAF variant.

 

And in the othe F-100 Super Sabre variants loadout ranges are also apparently halved.