Defect Tracking

Issue Information Issue ID #000079 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 2014.010 Fixed in 2014.010 Formation air patrols "created" by the Game EnginePosted by broncepulido on 19 July 2014 - 11:17 PM Testing my own finished Manila Galleon 1988 scenario, I saw an issue almost detected in other scenarios not designed by me, when I asked myself how someone can design strange and many AEW patrols with helicopters devoid of radar. As this was designed by me, I did some research on it and clearly: - In the Peleliu and Trípoli groups, the formation editor creates, show and operates a lot of AEW patrols with 1xAssault he…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000012 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2008.050 ⦁ Fixed in 2009.082 Low Level Light - IR Ship Flags Working?Posted by miller7219 on 06 March 2013 - 08:22 PM The Low Level Light (LLL) flag may be over-reaching with it's detection distance. Is the IR even working? When I ran the attached test scenario is was nighttime. You'll have to use my homemade database to run the attached test scenario (using EC2003 GIUK Battleset). 1. Play Blue and crank the time compression up to 5 mins. You'll get a detection at 21nm....if it's nighttime (haven't tested during daylight). Both Blue and Red a…

(ZUa)When attempting to change destroyed air base (ZUa) to blue using Turncoat, receive "Side change failed, no group id available" message. Created a test scenario and was unable to duplicate the issue. Earlier in the game I converted a red base to blue base (DSa) using Turncoat. There was an update to Turncoat after base was converted to DSa due to a previous GE crash caused by Turncoat. It appears that the side in the Turncoat base resets it self back to the Red instead of the Blue side. I have restarted the GE several times and the issue persists. In my test scenario I was able to change the sides of a base to any option available with out a p…

Defect Name: Runway too short for Harrier Build: HCE 2007.000 Repeatable: Y Operating System: XP DB used: HCDB-071223 Scenario used: Runway too short for Harrier.hph Long Description: Beachhead Charlie, AAp, allows some versions of the AV-8 Harrier to land on it yet prevents other Harriers. I think that all Harriers should be the same type of aircraft utilizting the same landing restrictions/requirements. Sequence to reproduce: 1. Attempt to ferry Harriers from ship group AIs to AAp Expected behaviour: All Harriers should have the same landing requirements. Observed behaviour: Harriers have different landing requirements. Runway_too_short_for_Harrier.zi…

Issue Information Issue ID #000016 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2009.076 Fixed in Debug Assertion Failed Wespac Scenario CrashPosted by eeustice on 06 May 2013 - 07:21 PM Edited Westpac scenario The Backyard crashed with a Debug Assertion Failed message just as a group of F-14 ran out of gas and crashed into the sea just before getting to their carrier. I have included in the zipped files the last 2 saved games the launcher saved. I also had a CV group AEC just vanish from the screen a while before that. If you wanted to land planes on the carrier you could see it in the Select Group for landing window however it NM w…

Issue Information Issue ID #000048 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 0000.000 Fixed in Playing user scenariosPosted by PongoDeMer on 17 September 2013 - 11:55 PM Simple question: I have returned to HUCE and I have unzipped a number of user scenarios into the HUCE folder. I then booted up the game and searched all the battlesets and they are not there. I have also searched every file revealed by the 'load user scenario' tab in the file menu of the game... again nothing there! What am I doing wrong? PongoDeMer Issue-048-Playing-user-scenarios.pdf

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000009 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2009.050 ⦁ Fixed in 2009.082 AI Gunnery Doesn't Adhere to ROFPosted by miller7219 on 05 March 2013 - 07:19 PM AI gunnery continually fires non-stop until either it runs out of ammo or target is sunk. Player gunnery adheres to the ROF properly. The AI wins every surface-to-surface gunnery duel in very quick fashion! I tested with 2009.074 too, and same result. I recall that I noticed this a few years back, but never got around to reporting it. Effectively surface-to-surface gunnery is broken unless the AI can be fixed to play fair.

Defect Name: Ineligible target type Build: HCE 2007.000 Repeatable: Y Operating System: XP DB used: HCDB-071223 Scenario used: Ineligible target type.hph Long Description: When ordered to attack a surface group known to contain ships, subs, and aircraft, only subs and aircraft are offered as target types. Sequence to reproduce: 1. Order DOa to attack ZRc. 2. Only Submarine and Aircraft show up as eligible targets Expected behaviour: All three platform types should show up on selection menu Observed behaviour: Only two platform types show up on selection menu Ineligible_target_type.zip

Issue Information Issue ID #000017 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2009.076 Fixed in GE allows launching AAMs on target without exact fixPosted by Grumble on 09 May 2013 - 11:00 AM When a target is in range of an AAM the GE allows launch on target without exact fix. This is regardless of guidance type, so IR, SARH and Active Homing, etc., all affected. The attacking a/c (well, the attacking side) should have exact fix before allowed to launch, currently the "Should we attempt to locate ..." SA message is only triggered if the target is out of range of the AAM. Expected behavior: GE should always prompt attacker first …

Issue Information Issue ID #000005 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 0000.000 Fixed in 2013/01/01Posted by cullen52 on 21 December 2012 - 12:28 PM Will there be an extension of the 2013/01/01 --- 2009.66 upgrade or has it been replaced. If so, where might I download it. Thank you for any information. Issue-005-2013-01-01.pdf

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000013 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2008.050 ⦁ Fixed in 2009.082 Can't fire ASuW at surfaced subPosted by mavfin on 05 April 2013 - 08:23 PM GE is 2009.076. Attached file is original GIUK, scenario 3. Is this caused by the old DB, or a GE issue? Under 30 miles from the US surface group is a heavily damaged Tango on the surface. However, if I try to attack with surface ships, I get the choice of Standoff ASW or Short Range ASW. No choice of missiles. Soon as a helo takes off, I'll have a hard radar lock, and should be able to finish it off. I've had other instances of this,…

Issue Information Issue ID #000008 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2009.072 Fixed in Stopping Submarines problemPosted by broncepulido on 29 January 2013 - 04:22 PM I was thinking was bad scenario planification in "The Halibut scenario" and playing red the blue submarines are undetected but never find the "cable", but not, now also the blue submarines stopped after 20 minutes game time Issue-8-Stopping-Submarines-problem.pdf

Issue Information Issue ID #000108 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 92 – Will not fix Version 2015.004 Fixed in Heap Corruption DetectedPosted by eeustice on 02 May 2015 - 09:43 AM Tony, Repeated Heap Corruption Detected crashes in my edited Backyard scenario in the Westpac battle set. Seems to occur after a Russian SSBN is sunk NW of Andersen Air Force Base (Guam). Attached is screen shots of the crash, db that us used for the scenario, saved game file and the original edited scenario. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, Eric Issue-108-Heap-Corruption-Detected.pdf Assertion Failed.zip

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000025 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2009.082 ⦁ Fixed in 2009.083 Visual detection by deep subPosted by Grumble on 30 June 2013 - 02:29 AM : To Go 13:07:38:30 New contact: ZYS Slava: Slava from AHU Birmingham at a bearing of 250 degrees and a range of 39 nm Method: VISUAL Probably related to the fix in 082 Tony pointed out as: - Chg:B176 GE A platform with sonar of type active only could not detect anything. This has been fixed but the fix impacts all types of detections so thorough testing would be good. This is a larger problem as well affecting all detections. The code uses…

Issue Information Issue ID #000003 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 0000.000 Fixed in Error downloading scenarios?Posted by broncepulido on 06 December 2012 - 03:44 PM Trying to downloading some old scenarios, as the Battle of El Arish, I see it's not feasible, or I'm very dumb today: http://harpgamer.com...le-of-el-arish/ Issue-3-Error-downloading-scenarios_.pdf

Issue Information Issue ID #000055 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 92 – Will not fix Version 2009.097 Fixed in Issue-055-Scenario-Editor-Group-Window-2x-Garbbled.pdf

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000010 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2009.075 ⦁ Fixed in 2009.076 GE Main Window doesn't remember sizePosted by TonyE on 05 March 2013 - 09:33 PM I have not implemented the saving and restoring of the main window size since I turned off the Maximize upon game launch setting. This is a reminder to set up the saving and restoring of size and checking for whether the previous size is still valid (thanks to changed font dpi, monitor resolution changes, change in # or positioning of monitors) Issue-010-GE-Main-Window-doesn't-remember-size.pdf

Greetings All, I am noticing possible errors in how the game engine designates an icon for unknown contacts and/or allows attacking unknown contacts. Apologies if these are known issues. I still have a bunch of reading to do in the forum. Also, once I figure out what test scenario files to upload, will do. Examples: Small RED surface contact - BLUE platform: Bunker Hill class (Monterey (CM)) radiating air and surface radars. Sonar is in passive. - Weather report is perfect with visibility at 19 nm. - A small surface contact is identified by passive sonar at 22 nm. In the scenario the unit (Najin) is designate…

Issue Information Issue ID #000207 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status UNFILED Version 2017.016 Fixed in AC Loitering AltitudePosted by eeustice on 11 January 2018 - 05:32 PM When editing an Air Groups course AC would not loiter at end of course when AC stay at same altitude even though Loiter button was selected. To get the AC to loiter you need to go back into the Edit Order screen and select Set Altitude and Speed and then select Loiter. The AC will then loiter at the end of the new course. If you change altitude at the end of your course the AC will loiter at the new altitude without having to go bac and select loiter a 2nd time. Attache…

Issue Information Issue ID #000149 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 22 – Fix Verified Version 2016.002 Fixed in 2016.003 Can't launch P-3 for ASW attackPosted by TEPonta on 13 March 2016 - 10:23 PM After Unknown Sub Group OOU is detected, I attempt to launch a P-3 from Base AAa to attack. I went through all the normal steps to select the number and type of aircraft, but after executing the order, I get a window that says "Sir, we have no released weapons available to conduct an ASW attack". If I launch the aircraft on some other pretext and then order it to attack directly, all goes normally. Issue-149-Can't-launch-P-3-for-ASW-at…