Defect Tracking

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000114 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2015.007 ⦁ Fixed in 2015.008 Error renaming and reading bases in 2015.07Posted by broncepulido on 22 June 2015 - 12:38 PM In a in construction scenario I watched as the generic bases renamed have returned to generic names after HC2015.007 implemented. I've returned to HC2015.004 (I don't tested 005 to 006) and the renamed names are recovered. As example you can test in the attached LCS 2 scenario (is the standard issued scenario) as Fiery Cross Reef (ZXa) is reverted to Generic Small Airport. Is the same effect both in Game Engine and Sce…

Issue Information Issue ID #000077 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2014.010 Fixed in Mk2 Eagle Eye - 40nm visual detection of GBU/SDB/PGMPosted by Grumble on 15 July 2014 - 01:43 AM Linked to the Mk1 there is one other complication PGMs as Brad pointed out are supposed to be immune to AAM/SAM, they got very low RCS like the 6 for GBU-53 SDB II, to ensure this, but they are still being intercepted by AAM and SAM. Most GBUs have "High" max altitude and so these fly to target on High, I guess they are detected visually, as per 5.4.2. Radar log shows that radar detection is indeed impossible, in the first detection cycle…

Issue Information Issue ID #000158 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 2016.007 Fixed in Game Engine errour changing altitudePosted by broncepulido on 14 August 2016 - 07:25 AM Demo scenario to be played in the GIUK Battleset, 1980-2016 standard database. I did take-off with 2xF-35 from the Blue Base (launched with orders to attack Red Base). When trying to change height from Low to Very Low, errour messange and Game Engine stops (tested many times). When in other essay I did lauch 2xF-35 in patrol (with the idea of after they reach patrol point change height to very low and attack Red Base), almost immediantly launche…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000095 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2014.020 ⦁ Fixed in 2014.021 Variable Start Points in New SEPosted by eeustice on 25 October 2014 - 03:52 PM When selecting Variable Start Points in the Orders 2 Drop down menu all scenario variable start points are visible. Attached is a screen shot and the scenario file. The db is the same as in my last Issue Report. Please let me know if you have any questions. Eric Issue-095-Variable-Start-Points-in-New-SE.pdf Variable Start Points.zip

Issue Information Issue ID #000082 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Asssigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2014.013 Fixed in Window DetailPosted by eeustice on 20 August 2014 - 08:09 PM Window Detail box not aligned with data in the new SE, Attached is a screen shot of the box. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, E Issue-82-Window-Detail.pdf Window Detail.zip

Issue Information Issue ID #000141 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 2015.026 Fixed in 2015.026 GetDisk AnnexA ErrorPosted by eeustice on 22 December 2015 - 08:53 PM Just after the start of my Spratly 3 Test scenario receive a GetDisk AnnexA Error about 2 game seconds after starting saved game. Happened about 5 times in a row. Unable to continue playing scenario. Attached is the latest copy of my Fictional db, saved game and a word doc with a screen shot of the crash. Ran scenario again with out launching any Blue AC and crash occurred at the same time in the game at 25 second after start of scenario. Seems li…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000073 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2014.009 ⦁ Fixed in 2014.010 Terminal engagement sometimes does not occurPosted by CV32 on 23 May 2014 - 01:36 PM May be related to the current work in missile guidance, or at least that would be my uneducated guess. Behaviour is as follows: Active RH missile (whether AAM, ASM or SSM) appears to reach its intended target and then disappear. As if the terminal engagement did not happen. The behaviour appears to be inconsistent. Savegame is from HDS1 scenario 3.0 - Circle the Wagons Check the Harpoon SSM engagement in the North Sea. Issu…

The attached scenario is run in westpac BS using HCDB 150929 database. GE 2024.006. There is a single sub. THe max speed of this sub on surface is 10 kts. It is currently submerged and traveling at its max speed or 21 kts. Use command F2 to set the speed/depth to surfaced and any speed about 10, say 15. Execute the command and the sub continues on the surface at an illegal speed. If you set the speed again you are now only able to set the legal speeds if it remains surfaced. A similar thing happens with subs that have a higher surface speed than their max submerged speed. I would expect that when changing the speed/alt from submerged to surface you shou…

Issue Information Issue ID #000057 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2009.097 Fixed in GE - Fix formation station-keepingPosted by TonyE on 02 October 2013 - 11:13 AM The inability of group members to properly keep their stations in formation is a long-standing and well-known issue. Time to take another look at it and see what can be done. To investigate: * Station keeping in groups that have paths defined in the SE and remain untouched in the GE. * Station keeping in groups with no path and speed set. * Station keeping in groups that are moving at Flank speed. * Station keeping in groups at 5kts/creep. * Station keepin…

Issue Information Issue ID #000112 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 2015.007 Fixed in 2015.007 Refueling in HC Version 2015.007Posted by eeustice on 07 June 2015 - 12:08 PM Refueling Air Group FSA consisted of 5 groups of 5 Fighters and 1 group of 10 Tankers. Only 2 of the 5 fighter groups refueled. Other 3 were left high and dry Attached is the latest version of my db, a couple saved games, and the GE log file with refuel logging set in the HC Launcher. Before the changes were made with Refueling each group received an equal amount of fuel from the tankers. If you have any questions please let me know. I wa…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000072 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2014.008 ⦁ Fixed in 2014.009 Another overflow computing damage points?Posted by broncepulido on 21 May 2014 - 08:34 AM Two images of two damage outcomes running "Submarines Galore 2014!!!" (see adjunt file): In the first image, firing a Mk48 Mod 5 ADCAP (1988+) torpedo from SSN Hartford against an SSN Akula-class (K-317 Pantera). In my personal DB the Mk48 Mod 5 ADCAP has 105 damage points against a sub (and 209 against a surface ship). The Akula has 138 damage points. But the dialog Window about the impact reads Akula "hit 1 times for 30105 …

Issue Information Issue ID #000032 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2009.083 Fixed in Loiter at cruise speedPosted by Grumble on 26 July 2013 - 10:41 AM Aircrafts loitering at med or high altitude change indicated speed to cruise speed after saving then loading the game or cancelling an attack order. E.g. when the a/c prompts to launch weapons but the player cancels it. (there are probably other situations when this happens, these two are the most apparent) The a/c holds position and Throttle remains at "Loiter" but the Kts number changes to the a/c's med altitude cruise speed. Test scenario, load savegame 1 Group ACA …

Issue Information Issue ID #000093 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 2014.020 Fixed in Land Attack Missiles Have Incorrect Names in Unit WindowPosted by eeustice on 25 October 2014 - 10:47 AM Kind of a strange on here. The Land Attack missiles have odd names. In missile group BJM Target is ZJ003 8X RIM-162D. ZJ003 is a SA-6b missile battery. Missile launched was either a TACOM IV or TLAM-C or D. Kind of confused here on how to right this up. Checked db in both the SE and GE and it appears that I have all the correct missiles in my launchers. If this is a db issue I could not find it. Trying to launch an ASM a…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000066 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2009.102 ⦁ Fixed in 2014.001 Bearing Only TASM AttackPosted by eeustice on 03 April 2014 - 06:00 PM Westpac Battle set default Harpoon db. When launching a TASM or any other type of missile at a bearing only contact the TASM is shot down by your own TG or hits a ship in your own TG sinking your ship. I have seen this with air launched weapons. Attached is the test scenario and saved game just as the SAM is launched at the TASM (TASM2.0022) and the file 1 min before the launch (TASM2-0021). The scenario file name is TASM3 Please let me know …

Issue Information Issue ID #000034 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2009.085 Fixed in SE Crashes if incorrect aircraft type is selectedPosted by eeustice on 27 July 2013 - 05:58 PM SE crashed while trying to add helo's on TF ships in Battle Set HDS9. Problem occurred when an SH-60 Seahawk was attempted to be added to the USS Yorktown which is not on the list of Helo's that can be used on that type of ship. Suggest that when an incorrect aircraft type is accidently selected that the Add button is disabled. Same should happen if a Ship has no air craft capability. Several ship classes have a 0 aircraft capacity, but a li…

Issue Information Issue ID #000096 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 2014.020 Fixed in 2014.020 Helo blip enhancer too effective?Posted by CV32 on 30 October 2014 - 05:11 AM Launched an ASuW strike of more than a dozen antiship missiles at an enemy surface group. A pair of enemy helicopters (Helix, iirc) along the missile flight path decoyed ALL of the missiles. I will try and get a useful savegame, but this might be a tweaking issue rather than a bug as such. Issue-096-Helo-blip-enhancer-too-effective.pdf

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000059 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2009.099 ⦁ Fixed in 2009.101 Base Name Changes on its OwnPosted by eeustice on 11 October 2013 - 07:28 PM In updates 2009.098-100 Kadena AB, USA changes names after inserted into WesPac Scenario 9.0 The Backyard. If you create a new base from the default blank screen the base name is ok. Problem does not exist in the 2009.096 SE release. Attached are screen shots of the different releases and a screen with the base added in the default screen by it self. Please let me know if you have any questions. I would like to know if it would be possible …

Open the save, there's a group of planes in the south with dozens of nuclear anti-ship missiles. Use them to attack the blue surface group to their south and the AI automatic choice wants to dump all ~65 missiles into the first ship in the list. This might have impacts on the AI, even though as humans we can de-allocate and retarget then launch. Incidentally, is there a way to add a button that de-allocates every weapon attacking a fleet? nuketarget.hp2

Start a new WestPac mission with Game Options all to Yes except for Full Ordnance. Side: BLUE. Then choose the last mission, "The Backyard", hit New Game - and for me it usually crashes at this point. It seems to have something to do with mission settings, because when I set all Game Options to Yes, it launches just fine. OS: XP Ver: HCE, the latest relase, meaning 2007.000, I guess. DB: Standard one that goes with this release.

Issue Information Issue ID #000029 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 - None Assigned Status 10 - Confirmed Version 2009.084 Fixed in HDS3 range circles off by 10%Posted by Grumble on 16 July 2013 - 12:53 AM Range circles in HDS3 are displayed 10% shorter than the nominal value. This does not seem to effect the game mechanics, for example AAM attacks are made from the true possible distance, but the display shows that AAMs are fired when the target is still outside of the AAM range circle. First I spotted only the AAM discrepancy but click-measuring easily shows that all circles are off. E.g. clicking the opposite edges of Phoenix AAM range circle: 199-200nm (expect…