Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Played the NACV scenario #15 "Retreat". The Soviet unit CVHG Baku has mount/weapon mismatch. The SA-N-9 launchers has been given SS-N-9 Siren anti-ship missiles.

image.thumb.png.13f760a0d850fe213b5a7eb1e859d422.png

Edit - 

Also the Badger-J doesn't have any jammers in it's loadout (like how the EA-6B has them). So it becomes useless for anything except providing a surface search radar backup to the Bear D.

And the Nimrod ASW plane having sidewinders is making the AI use it for intercepting air units even though it's the ASW loadout. It's going for them even if that air unit is a 12 plane squadron of Flankers. They're probably better off with those removed from the ASW loadout.

Posted
On 7/27/2025 at 3:49 AM, mack said:

Played the NACV scenario #15 "Retreat". The Soviet unit CVHG Baku has mount/weapon mismatch. The SA-N-9 launchers has been given SS-N-9 Siren anti-ship missiles.

That is what is known as a pre-commondb BattleSet so it does not use the user modifiable databases.  I strongly suggest players only play the EC2003 and 'newer' BattleSets as they use the user-created databases and also don't have sub-optimal (i.e. compatibility) logic.

  • Like 2
Posted
6 hours ago, TonyE said:

That is what is known as a pre-commondb BattleSet so it does not use the user modifiable databases.  I strongly suggest players only play the EC2003 and 'newer' BattleSets as they use the user-created databases and also don't have sub-optimal (i.e. compatibility) logic.

I figured that might be the case, but I've played that mission quite a while and never seen it have the SSM's instead of the SAMs. Maybe it was and I just never noticed. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, mack said:

I figured that might be the case, but I've played that mission quite a while and never seen it have the SSM's instead of the SAMs. Maybe it was and I just never noticed. 

Ah, I missed the nuance about SAM vs. SSM.  It appears things went awry between HC97 and HC2002 per the attached screenshots I just grabbed.  

Can you post in the Issue Reports forum?  Be specific about the BattleSet since this is a BattleSet specific issue and is not related to HCDB.

 

Thanks for bringing it up!

HC_Baku_SA-N-9_HC97.png

HC_Baku_SS-N-9_HC2002.png

Posted
3 minutes ago, TonyE said:

Ah, I missed the nuance about SAM vs. SSM.  It appears things went awry between HC97 and HC2002 per the attached screenshots I just grabbed.  

Can you post in the Issue Reports forum?  Be specific about the BattleSet since this is a BattleSet specific issue and is not related to HCDB.

You can 'fix' this one by copying NACV.res and NACV.rsr from HUCE\HC20\WH00163D\ to HUCE\ but that may re-introduce other issues (like Baku being type AFS instead of CVHG, Kalinin no longer being a BCGN, etc.)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...