Defect Tracking

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000144 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 2 – Fair ⦁ Status 12 – Working as Intended ⦁ Version 2015.025 ⦁ Fixed in 2015.025 Platform Annex, Mount AnnexPosted by gkm on 22 January 2016 - 06:57 PM DB editor balks on adding data. I can not attach files, your site says that I am not allowed to attach certain types of files MSWord (with screenshots), MS Access. Issue-144-Platform-Annex-Mount-Annex.pdf Official HC db Screen Shots.zip pfData2005.zip This is a description of what I have been running into on the Platform Editor.zip

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000159 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 12 – Working as Intended ⦁ Version 2016.017 ⦁ Fixed in 2016.017 Fox-3, but activating radar!Posted by broncepulido on 23 August 2016 - 11:14 AM Testing the F-35A Learning Curve scenario I see when a F-35A flight (or Portuguese Air Force F-16) is ordered to intercept Russian warplanes, even within or beyond AIM-120 AMRAAM missile range, the F-35A (or F-16) radar is activated, delating our presence to the opossite side. One of the main ideas of active radar homing missiles is to not reveal the launcher plane position, but with those actiones their position is revealed…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000091 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 11 – Cannot Reproduce ⦁ Version 2014.018 ⦁ Fixed in Get Annex ErrorPosted by eeustice on 12 October 2014 - 10:24 AM Upon opening Saved game WP Backyard 936-4 from last night received a Get Annex Error. Loaded last game save file WP Backyard 936-3.0013 and game loaded. I looked for item 13617 but I could not fine item. I don't know which annex is 13. After saving my game upon exiting the game last night I received a Debug Assertion Fault. Pondering if they are related? Attached are the 2 saved game files a copy of the screen shot and the GE log. The db is the same…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000083 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 11 – Cannot Reproduce ⦁ Version 2014.015 ⦁ Fixed in Debug Assertion FaultPosted by eeustice on 06 September 2014 - 10:39 PM Upon exiting the game received a Debug Assertion Fault (see attached word doc for the screen shot). Game was saved before GE was closed. I have seen this a couple of times in the past upon closing the GE. Attached is a copy of the latest db, saved game, screen shot and for your viewing pleasure in the new SE a copy of the scenario. If you have any questions please let me know, Thanks, Eric Issue-083-Debug-Assertion-Fault.pdf DAF 9-7-14…

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000119 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 11 – Cannot Reproduce ⦁ Version 2015.017 ⦁ Fixed in Errour building group or base.Posted by broncepulido on 10 October 2015 - 10:59 AM Build 2005.017, Middle East Map, latest HCDB. I'm keep working in a current times Latakia scenario. How I want a pair more of coastal Syrian ports I duplicted two times more Tartus to simulate Latakia Port and Baniyas. The second time I choosed to create Tartus (third time if we exclude the original Tartus placement), it was open as usual the menu to include some ships in the group, and added by the SE the first Albanian vessel in the …

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000122 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 11 – Cannot Reproduce ⦁ Version 2015.020 ⦁ Fixed in Run-time Error '94'Posted by eeustice on 19 October 2015 - 10:07 AM When importing my db for editing received a Run-time Error '94'. Unable to load db. I worked on the db Sat and my db was fine. I should have never had the need to import it. Attached is a copy of my db and screen shots of the Access debug window and the screen shot of the msg received when I selected Import. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, Eric Issue-122-Run-time-Error-'94'.pdf HCEEFDB-151017.zip

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000176 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 11 – Cannot Reproduce ⦁ Version 2016.003 ⦁ Fixed in SE Run-Time Check Failure 3Posted by eeustice on 18 January 2017 - 06:06 PM When trying to open Scenario with SE received a Run-Time Check Failure 3 and was unable to open scenario for editing. Included is a screen shot of the message receive from the SE, Complete scenario SP4 that was my last release and a copy of my fictional db. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, Eric Issue-176-SE-Run-Time-Check-Failure-3.pdf Run-Time Check Failure 3.zip

Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000164 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 11 – Cannot Reproduce ⦁ Version 2016.010 ⦁ Fixed in "Phantom" groups splitting groups in SEPosted by broncepulido on 05 November 2016 - 01:21 AM For sake of accelerate scenario building, many times I build a group with many units (Iranian MANPADS in this example), and later split it to place the diverse units on the map. Now, in SC 2016.10 (and probably in previous versions), if you split the group, the new group is not showed on the map at first instance. But you can select it alternatively with the space bar and delete keys, and after selected you can "change group posi…

Issue Information Issue ID #000024 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 91 – Duplicate Version 2009.076 Fixed in Dead fish in the water - Red subs do not navigatePosted by Grumble on 16 June 2013 - 09:33 AM Playing HDS2 3.0, Convoy Ho!, red submarines were painfully hard to detect, yet they were themselves very passive. I checked what are they up to with Show All. Looks like there is a some problem, either with the scenario or with the AI navigation, SE shows red groups would need to do creep speed on their patrol routes, except perhaps ZKU, starting from further North at 25kts, but ZKU would also slow down to 5kts after reaching the expecte…

Issue Information Issue ID #000092 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 91 – Duplicate Version 2014.019 Fixed in Minor graphic column error in SE 32-bitsPosted by broncepulido on 16 October 2014 - 05:25 PM Building a new sub scenario I saw a lack of correlation between weapons values and columns in the Scenario Editor 32-bits. In the game engine all is ok. In short: The quantity of weapons number is showed in the Target type column. The target type is showed in the Range column. The weapon ranges is showed in the Hit% column The weapon PH is showed in the Damage column. See the example in attached Word file. Issue-092-Minor-graphic-col…

Issue Information Issue ID #000124 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 91 – Duplicate Version 2015.022 Fixed in 2015.023 Weapon expenditure not showedPosted by broncepulido on 28 October 2015 - 04:22 PM I'm not sure if related with this, but playing the Clash of DDGs scenario with Build 2015.022, clicking in one ship in the "Unit Window", and clicking in "Full" and in "Weapons Details", is not showed missile or gun expediture at all, and it's impossible. Previously the notation was with two figures separed with a slash, type "Standard MR2 Block IIIb 40/40", changing to 39/40 just to 0/40 whith all the missile magazine depleted, but now i…

Issue Information Issue ID #000001 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 91 – Duplicate Version 2015.028 Fixed in 2016.002 Undetermined problem finishing scenarioPosted by broncepulido on 13 March 2016 - 02:14 PM Just when I was finishing the building of a great scenario, something is wrong and now the scenario can't start (it only lacks delete some US submarines, add paths and speeds to submarines and add other chinese ships). I was thinking the problem was the Stennis Group (AEC), but I'm not sure (perhaps after change variable start points, but I don't see it clear). Too late in the day to find it now! (see attached file).

Issue Information Issue ID #000006 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 20 – Fix Postponed Version 0000.000 Fixed in Scenario Editor Victory Conditions math problemPosted by broncepulido on 06 January 2013 - 01:56 AM When I put as victory condition in the Scenario Editor (I use the last version of it) 300 planes shot-down, I see after reflected as victory condition in the window only 44 planes shot-down. After a short testing,I think I shaw the same problem as with the missiles and decoys some weeks ago: if I put 255 or less planes shot-down as victory condition everything is OK, if I put 256 the victory condition showed is 1 plane shot-do…

Issue Information Issue ID #000058 Issue Type Suggestion Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 30 – Feature Request Version 2009.097 Fixed in GE - Enable player to set initial formation of surface groupsPosted by Grumble on 05 October 2013 - 06:59 AM Allow the player to rearrange formation of surface (&submarine) groups at the start of the scenario, as if in SE. I start most scenarios by rearranging formations of my surface groups. For 2 to 6 hours my ships are just transiting to stations I prefer. During this time my groups are not battle ready as would want them to be. Ships also either transit at flank speed, not good if enemy subs are around, or I h…

Issue Information Issue ID #000074 Issue Type Issue Severity 1 – Low Status 30 – Feature Request Version 2014.010 Fixed in User scenarios loosing orders txt files through save/loadPosted by Grumble on 25 May 2014 - 11:02 PM A cosmetic one, GE looses track of the Red/Blue side orders txt files of User scenarios when the scenario is loaded from a save game. OK: When the User scenario is started anew from the scenario file, the orders are correctly loaded from <scenarioname>.BLx/RDx files ISSUE: When a save game of the User scenario is loaded, GE searches for the orders files under <savegame>.BLx/RDx. Repro: Load mod HDSC10 user scen check Show…

Issue Information Issue ID #000001 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 22 – Fix Verified Version 2007.000 Fixed in 2008.025 Cannon fire onlyPosted by TonyE on 09 September 2012 - 06:57 PM Scenario used: saved game Cannon fire only.hpi Long Description: When ordered to intercept with Sidewinders and Phoenix, Tomcats show the "Should we attack with only cannon fire?" message. The targets are well within Phoenix range. Even if target is inside the minimum range of Phoenix and _outside_ maximum range of Sidewinder, Staff Assistance should ask to engage and use the shorter-ranged Sidewinder as the basis and display a message like, "Effective …

Issue Information Issue ID #000149 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 22 – Fix Verified Version 2016.002 Fixed in 2016.003 Can't launch P-3 for ASW attackPosted by TEPonta on 13 March 2016 - 10:23 PM After Unknown Sub Group OOU is detected, I attempt to launch a P-3 from Base AAa to attack. I went through all the normal steps to select the number and type of aircraft, but after executing the order, I get a window that says "Sir, we have no released weapons available to conduct an ASW attack". If I launch the aircraft on some other pretext and then order it to attack directly, all goes normally. Issue-149-Can't-launch-P-3-for-ASW-at…

Issue Information Issue ID #000055 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 92 – Will not fix Version 2009.097 Fixed in Issue-055-Scenario-Editor-Group-Window-2x-Garbbled.pdf

Issue Information Issue ID #000108 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 92 – Will not fix Version 2015.004 Fixed in Heap Corruption DetectedPosted by eeustice on 02 May 2015 - 09:43 AM Tony, Repeated Heap Corruption Detected crashes in my edited Backyard scenario in the Westpac battle set. Seems to occur after a Russian SSBN is sunk NW of Andersen Air Force Base (Guam). Attached is screen shots of the crash, db that us used for the scenario, saved game file and the original edited scenario. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, Eric Issue-108-Heap-Corruption-Detected.pdf Assertion Failed.zip

Issue Information Issue ID #000005 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 90 – Not an Issue Version 0000.000 Fixed in 2013/01/01Posted by cullen52 on 21 December 2012 - 12:28 PM Will there be an extension of the 2013/01/01 --- 2009.66 upgrade or has it been replaced. If so, where might I download it. Thank you for any information. Issue-005-2013-01-01.pdf