pboiler Posted August 26, 2008 Report Posted August 26, 2008 File Name: Russia vs Japan File Submitter: pboiler File Submitted: 26 Aug 2008 File Updated: 26 Aug 2008 File Category: WestPac DB Used: HCDB Authors: pboiler Battleset-WPac: .scq - WPac - WestPac Russia-Japan war over newly discovered oil fields. Click here to download this file Quote
CV32 Posted August 27, 2008 Report Posted August 27, 2008 SPOILERS APPLY ... * * * * * * pboiler, Although I have just opened your scenario to take a quick look, I have just a couple of (hopefully) helpful comments: (1) Although you appear to intend that this scenario by played by RED, there are no RED orders included. (2) The map is much less cluttered if you place airbase air defenses inside the airbase's formation. Quote
Herman Posted August 27, 2008 Report Posted August 27, 2008 I saw the same as CV32. There are no Red orders. I played the game through as Red, anyway. I'm very impressed with the scenario. Action occurs throughout. You have lots of variety in the units and even though it is a Monster-sized scenario, it doesn't feel like a 'brute-force' treatment. Defences are well laid out and inter-locking. The Lightnings are simply lethal. The only time they revealed themselves is when they fired. Otherwise, they were invisible to all forms of radar. Although I did run the game through and destroyed all the Blue units, I was unable to trigger any ViConds at any point in time. There appear to be "duplicates" of some bases. Is this intentional? i.e. there appear to be 2 Komaki airfields. Quote
CV32 Posted September 2, 2008 Report Posted September 2, 2008 I'm very impressed with the scenario. Action occurs throughout. You have lots of variety in the units and even though it is a Monster-sized scenario, it doesn't feel like a 'brute-force' treatment. Defences are well laid out and inter-locking. I had the same feeling. Good balance without feeling overwhelmed by too much to do or too many enemy units. The Lightnings are simply lethal. The only time they revealed themselves is when they fired. Otherwise, they were invisible to all forms of radar. I found the JSF to be formidable as well, but they were only "invisible" when their own radars were silent. This happened a few times, especially when they attempted to sneak into Russian territory and shoot down my orbiting Mainstays. They took several of my Su-27 and Su-35 Flankers when I attempted to go toe to toe with them. There appear to be "duplicates" of some bases. Is this intentional? i.e. there appear to be 2 Komaki airfields. Confirmed. I have damaged or destroyed a number of Blue bases, and wiped out the Blue CVBG. No victory conditions triggered. Quote
Herman Posted September 2, 2008 Report Posted September 2, 2008 The Lightnings are simply lethal. The only time they revealed themselves is when they fired. Otherwise, they were invisible to all forms of radar. I found the JSF to be formidable as well, but they were only "invisible" when their own radars were silent. This happened a few times, especially when they attempted to sneak into Russian territory and shoot down my orbiting Mainstays. They took several of my Su-27 and Su-35 Flankers when I attempted to go toe to toe with them. The Lightnings gave themselves away only when they turned on their own radar. A couple of them managed to waltz in and do damage if they kept their radar off. In the future, if I ever have F-35 on my side, I'm never going to turn on the radar. I'll just go wherever I please and fire away. I don't think that this good for the AI. To make the AI truly challenging, is there a way to 'remove' the radar from the F-35? Or, possibly just add the radar as a 'pod' to certain loadouts? A radar-less F-35 with a load of AMRAAM is going to be invincible. Quote
CV32 Posted September 2, 2008 Report Posted September 2, 2008 To make the AI truly challenging, is there a way to 'remove' the radar from the F-35? Or, possibly just add the radar as a 'pod' to certain loadouts? A radar-less F-35 with a load of AMRAAM is going to be invincible. I won't likely do that. I'd much rather focus efforts on creating the low probability of intercept (LPI) radar model in the code. Quote
Warhorse64 Posted September 2, 2008 Report Posted September 2, 2008 Hey, if you fly it at Low level with the radar off, absolutely anything armed with the -C5, -C7, or -D model of the AIM-120 is going to be horrifically lethal air-to-air. Look-down detection ranges for the fighter radars generally aren't great enough to spot you before you get into your own missile range. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.