CV32 Posted January 10, 2017 Report Share Posted January 10, 2017 The Case for Strategic Discipline During the Next Presidency (War on the Rocks) The lack of banter here - let alone debate - following the US election has been somewhat surprising to me. How about it? In the context of Harpoon relevant scenarios, do you think the world is a scarier place? Less scary? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Silent Hunter UK Posted January 10, 2017 Report Share Posted January 10, 2017 It may well be wise to dust off your copies of Persian Incursion and possibly update them; an Iran strike is arguably back on the table - although it will depend on whether Israel's current PM survives the current corruption allegations and who replaces him. I think that NATO vs. Russia is less likely - Clinton would be far more confrontational towards Russia for one thing. I personally doubt that Putin would invade the Baltic countries anyway if faced with sufficient chance that he'd face a protracted guerilla war from the Estonians. They invented Skype and have more mobile phones than people, so what they could do against an occupying force would be very 'interesting' to see. US vs. China - probably an increased war of words, but both sides have too much to lose from a conventional war, let alone a nuclear one. The bigger concern I have in the medium term is the continued existence of the United States in its current form. If Trump exits the scene by any other means than his natural death or term limits (impeachment, assassination or being declared incapable via the 25th Amendment), there are enough people with military-grade weaponry out there to make an uprising a serious problem in the US. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CV32 Posted January 10, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 10, 2017 I agree with the author's article that there must be a "better equilibrium point somewhere between rampant retrenchment and unbridled hegemonic primacy." The unknowns include how other potential foes (Iran, China, Russia, etc) react to an American effort to find that balancing point, and then what will be the counter-reaction. The bigger concern I have in the medium term is the continued existence of the United States in its current form. If Trump exits the scene by any other means than his natural death or term limits (impeachment, assassination or being declared incapable via the 25th Amendment), there are enough people with military-grade weaponry out there to make an uprising a serious problem in the US. My own view of that is that thank goodness there are enough people in the USA with the will and the means to keep a "serious problem" from emerging. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CV32 Posted January 11, 2017 Author Report Share Posted January 11, 2017 I should add that I think another confrontation with Iran in the Persian Gulf is probably inevitable. The way Iran has been behaving since the nuclear 'deal' was reached, is strongly indicative of its future intentions. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.