Jump to content

Need help with Engagement Turns


kmart494

Recommended Posts

Last night I played a scenario where an Arleigh Burke DDG is attacked by SS-N-22 missiles fired from a Sovremenny DDG. The Sov had Helix AEW support but the Burke had no copter on board, and so detection of inbound missiles was limited to the SPY-1 radar.

 

Here was the problem. After the 1st move phase of an Engagement Turn the Sunburns were just outside the radar horizon of 24 nm and are still undetected. In the 2nd move phase the missiles are 6.9 nm closer. But, since the ship had no prior detection of the missiles, the Burke cannot see or fire on them in the 2nd fire phase, right?

 

If so, then the missiles move another 6.9 nm (1st move of next turn) but technically remain undetected until the detection phase. Now the missiles move another 6.9 nm closer(2nd move) and the burke can fire in defense (2nd fire phase). The missiles moved a little more than 20 nm during this event, leaving very little room to deal with them.

 

Is my interpretation of the sequence of the Engagement Turn correct?

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply.

 

Here is a little twist on the above scenario. Let's say that the Burke has AEW support and the inbound missiles are detected before they reach the Burke's radar horizon. Does this mean that the Burke can fire on them as soon as they clear the radar horizon? I am assuming the SAMs must be directed by the launching ship, and thus the weapon directors must have a clear radar line of sight to the targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. Here is a little twist on the above scenario. Let's say that the Burke has AEW support and the inbound missiles are detected before they reach the Burke's radar horizon. Does this mean that the Burke can fire on them as soon as they clear the radar horizon? I am assuming the SAMs must be directed by the launching ship, and thus the weapon directors must have a clear radar line of sight to the targets.

Yes, with SM-2 it would. SM-6 would permit over the horizon engagement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm, even without CEC Burke could fire the SM-2 since they do the high altitude climb. Just as long as the inbound missiles can be painted by the director at the time of intercept right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, the inertial/midcourse mode would permit launching the SM-2 into a 'basket' where they can then be gathered into the SARH mode (once the director can paint the target).

 

The rules have a whole sidebar on the Aegis system under rule 5.3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...