Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'VerRep: 2015.024'.
Found 6 results
-
Issue Information ⦁ Issue ID #000130 ⦁ Issue Type Issue ⦁ Severity 0 – None Assigned ⦁ Status 21 - Fix Coded ⦁ Version 2015.024 ⦁ Fixed in 2015.025 Air group blocked in launchingPosted by broncepulido on 11 November 2015 - 10:28 AM Playing the Tesseract scenario by Brad (but probably it can apply to any other). Vietnamese Air Force in Da Nang IAP (AAa). Some Chinese long range missiles were fired at Da Nang at the scenario start. To prevent loses, I ordered to take-off the few Vietnamese planes present at Da Nang, in small groups. - Group BG000 composed by 2xSu-27MK2V with Intercept-2 loadout. - Group BH000 composed by 2xSu-27MK2V Flanker-F with Precis loadout. Both groups lose 1xSu-27 at the take-off (killed in the runway by the incoming Chinese missiles). Now both groups (see attached file) are composed now only by 1xSu-27, but both are "frozen" in the "launching" phase, waiting for the other Su-27 (but them can never reach the group, both are destroyed), I can't issue orders to the two groups, and very probably in hour or so they will be destroyed by lack of fuel! I think never experimented this issue in similar cases for years, I'm almost sure is a new "effect"! Attached Files Issue-130-Air-group-blocked-in-launching.pdf TESSER LAUNCHING.zip
-
Issue Information Issue ID #000125 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2015.023 Fixed in 2015.024 Planes Allowed on UnitsPosted by eeustice on 29 October 2015 - 03:51 PM When adding AC to ship or land unit the SE allows more AC than the AC limit set in the db. In example provided the db shows AC capacity of 10. In the SE I was able to add 30 AC. The GE also shows 30 AC. So far neither PE or SE has crashed. Attached is screen shots of the db THAAD Bat. Attached is a screen shot of 30 AC added in the SE. Attached is a screen shot of 30 AC in the THAAD unit in the PE Attached is the latest copy of my db and edited scenario. If you have any questions please let me know. Thanks, Eric Issue-125-Planes-Allowed-on-Units.pdf HCEEFDB-151029-1.zip
-
Issue Information Issue ID #000132 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2015.024 Fixed in 2015.025 No linked file in from Order Writer in New SEPosted by eeustice on 15 November 2015 - 05:50 PM I was writing the orders for my first scenario. I opened the Order Writer and linked the file to my scenario. However when I open the scenario the orders. The zip files have the latest db, scenario file, the word version of the orders and what looks like 2 files that were created with Red and Blue orders. I’m not sure what I did wrong. If possible can you let me know what I did wrong and lead me down the right path. Thanks, Eric Issue-132-No-linked-file-in-from-Order-Writer-in-New-SE.pdf Spartly Island Orders.zip
-
Issue Information Issue ID #000129 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2015.024 Fixed in 2015.025 Real sonar range not showed in "Unit Window/Full" in GE.Posted by broncepulido on 02 November 2015 - 07:26 AM When you select an individual unit (ship or submarine sonar-equipped) in the "Unit Window" and click on the virtual button "Full" unit to see the unit current characteristics, you now view only the theoretical sonar range (both active and passive) of the unit, not the altered/extended sonar range of the unit because the particular circumstances of that sea, environment and time. Issue-129-Real-sonar-range-not-showed-in-Unit-Window-Full-in-GE.pdf -
Issue Information Issue ID #000127 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2015.024 Fixed in 2015.026 GE errour or rare DB errour???Posted by broncepulido on 31 October 2015 - 10:03 AM Just when everything looks fine, great undetermined errour. Employing Build 2015.23, when playing the Clash of DDGs scenario, I get strange lectures when clicking in a unit in the "Group Map", later "Display", later "Platform Display/Active classes only" (ships), in this limited scenario, with ship classes limited to Burke IIA and three Chinese types, the window show eight types of ships (with impossible types as Spruance or Belknap!), only the Burke present in the original scenario! (some examples in the attached zip as Test DB errour 31-10-2015 1 and 2). Also, playing the Latakia 2015 scenario I get another errour (attached as Test DB errour 31-10-2015 3), when showing the scroll list with "Platform Display/Active classes only" (aircrafts), you get a list with "no-aircraft" types, as SA-5b, ELINT site or Russian warships names! At first I was thinking it could be a number compilation errour in my personal customized HCDB, but loading the standard HCDB by Brad I get similar results (those showed in the attached files). Issue-127-GE-errour-or-rare-DB-errour.pdf Test DB error 31-10-2015.zip
-
Issue Information Issue ID #000131 Issue Type Issue Severity 0 – None Assigned Status 23 – Fix Accepted By Reporter Version 2015.024 Fixed in 2015.025 Run-Time Check Failure #3 in new SEPosted by eeustice on 11 November 2015 - 04:13 PM When attempting to launch an AC attack from Stirling Australia (AFb) with or without tankers this msg appears using the new Scenario Editor. Attached is a screen shot of the issue, scenario and latest copy of my fictional db. If you have any questions please let me know. Eric PS: I was able to keep the AC attack by selecting Ignore. If possible can you let me know if the Run-Time Check failure will affect my scenario when I play it. This way I can move forward with it. Issue-131-Run-Time-Check-Failure-#3-in-new-SE.pdf Run-Time Check Failure #3 New SE.zip
