How US strategic antimissile defense could be made to work
An interesting piece. Contains a criticism of SM-3 testing methodologies and instead advocates airborne missile defense via stealthy drones.
How US strategic antimissile defense could be made to work
Started by CV32, Dec 18 2010 10:19 AM
3 replies to this topic
#2
Warhorse64
-
- Members
-
- 498 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 18 December 2010 - 11:02 AM
How US strategic antimissile defense could be made to work
An interesting piece. Contains a criticism of SM-3 testing methodologies and instead advocates airborne missile defense via stealthy drones.
Okay, so let me get this straight: they propose to defend against Iranian nukes by running a continuous CAP of stealthy drones over Iran?!? WTF have they been smoking?!?
#3
Silent Hunter UK
-
- Members
-
- 1,077 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 18 December 2010 - 11:14 AM
How US strategic antimissile defense could be made to work
An interesting piece. Contains a criticism of SM-3 testing methodologies and instead advocates airborne missile defense via stealthy drones.
Okay, so let me get this straight: they propose to defend against Iranian nukes by running a continuous CAP of stealthy drones over Iran?!?
No, they're talking about hovering outside the borders.
#4
Warhorse64
-
- Members
-
- 498 posts
Advanced Member
Posted 18 December 2010 - 01:12 PM
No, they're talking about hovering outside the borders.
Not with a range of only 300-500km on the interceptors, they aren't.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
